Every “custom exhaust” that is not properly tested and labeled by the US EPA IS illegal. 99% of aftermarket exhausts do NOT conform to the noise suppression requirements of the EPA mandates as per the SAE J331a full throttle testing procedure. You might “mind your own business” with LOUD exhausts but you destroy the daily quality of life of those who live and thrive in our communities.
I hate bullies…those who abuse children, the elderly, our handicapped, our families, with illegal, intrusive, physiologically dangerous, NOISE. There is a reason the mufflers on street use motorcycles are regulated, labeled, carefully tested and total motorcycle noise emissions limited to a relatively quiet 80dB(A) and your arrogance and your narcissism and your selfishness and your LOUD cult don’t trump this fact.
Florida Statutes Title XXIII. Motor Vehicles § 316.293. Motor vehicle noise
Current as of January 01, 2023
5) Noise abatement equipment modifications.–
(a) No person shall modify the exhaust system of a motor vehicle or any other noise-abatement device of a motor vehicle operated or to be operated upon the highways of this state in such a manner that the noise emitted by the motor vehicle is above that emitted by the vehicle as originally manufactured.
(b) No person shall operate a motor vehicle upon the highways of the state with an exhaust system or noise-abatement device so modified.
California’s “environmentalists” and State Legislators are hypocrites relevant to dangerous vehicle noise that destroys the environment while abusing the citizenry…
While touring the Bay Area of San Francisco, San Bruno, South San Francisco, Oakland, I was amazed to see and hear the belligerent, narcissistic, selfish, vehicular noise thugs that inundate California’s roadways; those noise bullies who operate illegally modified, illegally LOUD auto’s, trucks, motorcycles.
The US EPA, subsequent thorough testing and analysis relevant to the destruction to daily quality of life, the physiological dangers, of unregulated motor vehicle noise, concluded that 78dB(A) was the maximum safe noise level emissions for motor vehicles operated on America’s public roadways. Initially, for example, the US EPA regulated motorcycle noise emissions to 83dB(A) in 1983 and subsequent further evaluation determined that 83dB(A) was physiologically unsafe and therefore sought a 78dB(A) noise emissions restriction for all street use motorcycles going forward. Suzuki Motors complained that adhering to the 78dB(A) noise restriction would be cost prohibitive; therefore, the US EPA compromised and enacted a 80dB(A) “total” noise emissions for all street use motorcycles 1986 year model going forward. This Federal mandate remains relevant to this very day and every street-use motorcycle is mandated via the Code of Federal Regulations to be equipped with a properly labeled, quiet, muffler and matching frame label.
Unfortunately, the US EPA delegated enforcement of the 80dB(A) vehicular noise emission regulations to the States and the States, their legislators, their police, have been an utter failure to this very day. California’s legislators and Governor Newsom are not only environmental hypocrites but they’re as useless as the tits on a boar hog as they’ve enacted an impotent sound meter legislative mandate relevant to motor vehicle noise which allows for 95dB(A); logarithmically, 95dB(A) is 15X more intense than 80dB(A); therefore, California allows vehicular noise thugs to rule the roadways while the naive citizenry cows and accepts the abuse. Shame on California and shame on socialist Newsom.
Beautiful California, the Mecca of Liberal-Progressive insanity, a “paradise” that litters its mountain sides with useless windmills and its valleys with Chinese solar panels, a socialist utopia hopelessly deceived by the demonic cult of “man induced climate change,” a deceived State of liberal insanity that gags over plastic straws and liquid gold below their feet while allowing the abusive, narcissistic, thugs, of the LOUD vehicle cult[ure] to destroy the environment, destroy and abuse the daily quality of life of millions with illegally equipped, illegally LOUD motor vehicles…California, the mecca of those who worship the creature rather than the Creator while this beautiful State is destroyed by virtue signaling liberal elites and an arrogant, cocky, Governor that serves the Devil as opposed to his constituency (Romans 1:18-32).
§ 205.52 Vehicle noise emission standards.
(a)Low Speed Noise Emission Standard. Vehicles which are manufactured after the following effective dates shall be designed, built and equipped so that they will not produce sound emissions in excess of the levels indicated.
Effective date
Level
(i) January 1, 1979
83 dBA.
(ii) January 1, 1988
80 dBA.
(b) The standards set forth in paragraph (a) of this section refer to the sound emissions as measured in accordance with the procedures prescribed in § 205.54-1,2.
Houston, Texas, Quality of LIFE destroyed by illegal vehicular NOISE…
Attempted to get some rest in a RV Park on the north side of Houston, Harris County, last night as I’ll spend this morning seeking to renew my government issued permit to exercise my 2nd-Amendment right that shall not be abridged.
During the final years of my 31-year career with the Houston PD, I fought fervently to protect the daily quality of life, the health and welfare, of the citizenry within my area of responsibility from the narcissistic, thuggish, bully behavior of those who illegally modify their motorcycle, auto, truck, to emit dangerously intrusive NOISE.
My lawful efforts to enforce State 547.604 and City 30-3 were met with anger and hate from Houston’s mayoral staff; my police chief and his staff; the HPD motorcycle detail and Houston PD officers who rode and drove loud off-duty; the loud biker thugs and sports car thugs in Houston; business representatives that profit from the noise thuggery; motorcycle “rights” organizations from Texas to New York. I fought with the Internal Affairs Division, my own supervisor who violated the vehicle noise laws via his racing Corvette…
I fought the narcissistic gangs of biker thugs who cried and moaned at City Hall…you entertained their lies and obfuscation and threats…last night, listening to the incredibly noisy raceway that is the Hardy Toll Road and I-45 corridor…all I can say at this juncture…Houston, I told you so…I tried…but you have surrendered this once beautiful municipality to a criminal element that would have been absent if you would have permitted me and other officers to use illegal vehicle NOISE as probable cause for a stop and investigate; unfortunately, you and every other Woke-Progressive-Impotent municipality in the United States are reaping what you’ve sown in a lack of care and concern for the daily quality of life of the men and women who live and work in your jurisdiction and pay the taxes that make you a viable “community.” My conscience is clear…
An overwhelming majority of the automobiles, light-to-medium duty pick-up trucks, motorcycles, operating on the public roadways of the United States are regulated to a relatively quiet 80dB(A) total, maximum, noise emission level by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) via the Federal Code of Regulations (CFR). Companies who manufacture modified exhaust mechanisms and aftermarket exhausts that violate Federal noise emissions standards, a relatively safe and quiet noise emission standard represented by the OEM-factory installed muffler, should be civilly sued out of business and held criminally liable for the destruction of daily quality of life, the egregious health hazard, they have caused over the previous four-to-six decades in the United States and in every developed Nation around the World.
Companies who manufacture and retail these illegal exhausts like Magnaflow, Flowmaster, Vance & Hines, D&D, Yoshimura, Akrapovic, Cobra, Rinehart Racing, on and on the list goes and grows, these companies should be CRUSHED through the civil and criminal courts; yet, these culprit companies manufacture, distribute, retail, the illegal NOISE makers without any intervention from Federal and State regulators…perhaps it’s all about the money and to Hades with quality of life and health concerns where the law-abiding, tax-paying citizenry, is concerned? Why is this vehicular NOISE thuggery tolerated throughout the United States?
Motor vehicle noise has been regulated primarily for the health and safety, the daily quality of life, of the American citizen as unregulated motor vehicle noise is one of the prominent contributors to stress, heart disease, stroke, hypertension, as early mortality rates due to cardiovascular disease are directly attributable to unregulated traffic noise; unfortunately, enforcement of the 80dB(A) total noise emission restriction was delegated by the Federal Government to the States; tragically, our governors, county and local administrators, mayors, police chiefs, sheriffs, county commissioners and their law enforcement representatives have been an abysmal failure; this, while our Federal and State representatives have sold their soul to the man-induced climate change hoax, a money-making grab for politicians and globalists under the auspices of caring for the environment while vehicular NOISE thugs destroy the daily “climate” for millions exposed to their abusive, unlawful, NOISE; this, void any significant enforcement intervention…they’re all hypocrites, liars and thieves.
Unregulated motor vehicle noise is America’s true “national plague” and those who modify the relatively quiet, legal, regulated, factory installed muffler or replace same with a “not for road use,” closed course, racing, aftermarket exhaust and operate these illegally LOUD, illegally equipped, motor vehicles on our public roadways are irresponsible, selfish, narcissists who, with intent, audibly abuse America’s most innocent, our families, our children, the elderly, the handicapped; this, while our WOKE, impotent, law enforcement community; our State and local legislators who enact impotent vehicular noise laws; the judges who neglect to properly adjudicate violations of vehicular noise laws; law enforcement officers-judges-prosecutors who participate in and compromise with the illegal conduct, these are directly culpable for the destruction of our daily quality of life by undisciplined NOISE narcissistic thugs.
Tragically, due to law enforcement’s ineptness, laziness, ignorance of the motor vehicle noise laws and applicable enforcement techniques, the naive general public has grown dangerously complacent relevant to the physiological and psychological harm done by exposure to illegally LOUD motor vehicles; in fact, far too many American citizens have been so thoroughly inundated with this NOISE plague decade after decade; this, while law enforcement does NOTHING to stop the abuse, these citizens naively believe the motor vehicle noise is actually legal and the LOUD automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, that abuse them daily were manufactured that way…to be intrusively LOUD. One of my major obstacles during my enforcement years relevant to the selfish, abusive, thugs, who ride and drive loud was the question “Whose complaining about it?” from administrators and/or their desk puppets…the reason so many don’t complain is due to law enforcement’s failures over the years to intercede on behalf of the vehicular noise beleaguered citizenry. The reason so few people take a stand against the audible abuse of our children, our elderly, our handicapped, our families, is cowardliness, ignorance, laziness and a selfish fear of “getting involved” and suffering retribution.
A government’s “first duty” is the “protection” of its citizenry from abuse, violations of a citizen’s rights to life, liberty, domestic tranquility, the pursuit of happiness. America’s public roadways, especially those in our larger municipalities, have become the property and stomping grounds of the abusive vehicular noise thug, an arrogant child who destroys the daily quality of life of millions without any fear of law enforcement intervention or vigilante retribution; vehicular NOISE that is audible, in many cases, over one-mile under hard acceleration. This sound energy is nothing less than a physical assault upon the American public as a whole.
During my enforcement years as a police motorcycle officer and especially as a police patrol officer searching for outstanding warrants, I found vehicular noise violations to be the most lucrative form of “probable cause” for a traffic stop as the selfish, narcissistic, individual who abuses our most innocent with illegal vehicle noise is the very same narcissistic individual who has a propensity to violate the law where warrants and suspensions mandating incarceration are common. Why is law enforcement not taking advantage of vehicular noise as probable cause for a stop and investigate? Murderers, thieves, pedophiles, gang thugs, biker gang thugs, drive or ride as well and far too many are representative of the vehicular NOISE thug; therefore, stop them, perform the obligatory back-ground check and arrest these abusers of the public and impound their noisy piece of junk until it’s returned to quiet OEM-factory noise emission standards.
I fear that vigilantism will be the only viable recourse for the Father dedicated to protecting his wife and children from rampant vehicular noise abuse that unlawfully intrudes into our homes, places of work and worship and recreation. It is not difficult to envision the day that America’s “men” will be forced to take matters into their own hands seeing that America’s law enforcement community is too weak, too cowardly, too ignorant of the law, too compromised, too WOKE, to stop the vehicular NOISE abuse of our families; it’s a shame that these NOISE bullies are allowed run amuck void any consequences, any personal accountability, for their abuse of our children, the elderly, the handicapped, our families; this, 24/7/365. I agree that not a single vehicular noise thug is worth a day in jail or life in prison but what other choice is provided the husband, the father, the caretaker, who has a responsibility, a moral obligation, to defend their family from abusive thuggery so prevalent in American society today; unfortunately, America’s “men” have been castrated by a feminized perverse society, environmental estrogen, political correctness, fear of standing for and doing what is right.
Finally, those who have taken a solemn oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, to protect and defend the American citizen and our daily quality of life, these representatives of the law have failed and failed miserably; therefore, what is the law abiding citizen to do?
Message: My name is Rickey D. Holtsclaw. I currently reside at redacted, redacted, FL 33, Ph #redacted. On September 24th, 2023, my wife and I entered the Sam’s Wholesale parking lot located at 1450 Skibo Road at approximately 2000 hours. Sam’s was closed for business upon arrival but I drove our RV to the front doors where I observed a police vehicle with blue lights activated parked near the doors. An older Black male in uniform stopped us and asked politely something to the effect “Where are you going or what are you doing on my watch?” I explained that we were low on fuel and was hoping to stay in the Sam’s parking lot for the night; we were tired and wanted to obtain some fuel in the morning and proceed to Cape Hatteras. The uniformed gentleman stated that it was okay to park next to the trees in the corner of the parking lot near the fuel pumps as that’s where all the RV’s park..he then asked “Do you have your nine?” I advised him laughingly that I was retired Houston PD and had my nine in the front and a 38 in the back of the RV…and he laughed as he told my wife “Don’t worry…he’s got ya protected;” this, in response to my wife’s question “Should we be worried?”
I then proceeded to drive our RV to the spot designated by the police officer at which time my wife prepared the RV for the night. We have five-rescue dogs in the RV with us and they needed attention as well.
While taking care of some business online, my wife and I were amazed at the vehicle NOISE and the racing of motorcycles and modified auto’s and trucks on Skibo Rd…I was concerned that we would not be able to sleep…we were tired and had been on the road a good part of the day having left Fort McAllister Park in Georgia that morning. The vehicular NOISE was so intrusive that I called the Fayetteville PD’s dispatch at (910) 433-1529 and pleaded for assistance. I did not request that an officer meet with me for a report nor was my address taken by the call-taker at dispatch.
Just prior to my wife and I preparing to settle down and hopefully get some rest, I heard a loud bang on the outside of my RV. The blinds were down; therefore, I could not see who was outside; therefore, I was very concerned for my wife’s safety especially subsequent my discussion with the officer earlier that led me to believe the parking lot might not be the safest place to stay the night. I donned my off-duty revolver in my right shorts pocket and carefully exited the RV via the side door. I glanced to the rear of the RV and observed a vehicle that appeared to be the same police vehicle I had observed earlier when speaking with the officer at the front doors of Sam’s. I then carefully proceeded toward the front of my RV where I observed two-officers armed and in uniform, one Black officer and one White officer, both appeared to be in their mid-to-late twenties. I immediately raised my hands into the air and advised the officers that I was armed and that I was a retired Houston Police Officer to which the White officer said something to the effect “You’re fine.”
The White officer advised me that Sam’s Club does not permit overnight stays in their parking lot on the weekends. I advised the officers that I had received permission from the security officer earlier to park and stay the night. There was some small-talk exchanged at which time I asked the officers why they were not enforcing the motor vehicle noise laws and interceding on behalf of the citizenry relevant to the racing up and down Skibo Road? The Black officer obfuscated with something to the effect that he had not observed them racing; therefore, he could not intercede; to which, I advised the officer that they could hear the noise at that very moment but the officer again obfuscated his responsibilities; to which, I advised the officers “shame on you both” for not interceding and doing their job. I then turned and walked away and reentered my RV in preparation to exit the premises.
When I entered the RV, I removed my off-duty revolver from my right shorts pocket and placed it on the bed in the rear of the RV. I then proceeded to get things in order, those things that were loose and could fall during transport; securing our ladder, laptops, and other items had to be secured before I could safely leave. My wife, at that time, observed the officers standing to the left-side of the RV laughing at which time the Black officer banged on the side of the RV at which time I opened the side door and the Black officer approached stating the following…
Officer: “How many weapons do you have in the RV?”
Complainant: “Two”
Officer; (with hand on his duty weapon) “Do me a favor and get your shoes on cause I’m gonna seize both of your weapons if you don’t go ahead and leave now.”
Complainant: “What? I have a permit for the weapons.”
Officer: “I understand but you’re acting aggressive so that’s enough for me to go ahead and seize your weapons. (“You made me feel uncomfortable”) Go ahead and grab your shoes and I need you to leave because I was looking through the window and I saw you had your hand on your weapon.”
Complainant: “I had to put the weapon up.”
Officer: “That made me feel very uncomfortable because of the way you’re acting.”
Complainant: “Ok…we’re leaving.”
Complaint continued…
There was no need for the Black officer to re-approach the RV nor was there a reason to threaten and attempt to intimidate because I chastised the officers for not interceding on behalf of the vehicular NOISE beleaguered citizenry who are abused day and night by those who operate illegally LOUD, illegally equipped, motor vehicles on our public roadways; obviously, void any intercession by the Fayetteville Police Department.
Subsequent my interaction with the officers, I immediately drove away having been denied the time to secure equipment in the RV for operation. Finding a suitable place to park, I public-serviced the Fayetteville PD Dispatch once again and requested the names of the officers that had interviewed me in the Sam’s parking lot. Dispatch advised that a “Trent Folk” was working an off-duty assignment at Sam’s that evening but she did not know the name of the secondary officer. I advised dispatch that my complaint was NOT with the White officer but the arrogance and unprofessional behavior of the Black officer; to which, Dispatch or the call for service taker stated that she did not know the officers or the name of the Black officer.
I noticed the poor rating the local citizenry has given the Fayetteville NC PD and now I understand why. The arrogance and unprofessional attempt at intimidation by the Black Fayetteville officer was unnecessary. Sincerely, Rick Holtsclaw Video of last interaction with Fayetteville NC PD: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/EKHh2RilQWc
“Studies have been conducted to trace the amount of damage caused by the noise from various natural as well as man-made sources, especially traffic. In fact, noise has come to be associated with the mental, physical, emotional and psychological well-being of an individual, be it human beings or even animals. In legal terms, noise can be considered as an assault on an individual. ” http://home.uchicago.edu/~mstaisch/Sharad/papers/Legislative%20Aspects%20of%20Noise%20Pollution.pdf
Parkinson’s Disease is skyrocketing and has doubled over the previous 30-years. New Study confirms that the exponential rise in Parkinson’s is directly related to TRAFFIC NOISE.
Illegally LOUD Motor Vehicles—A Symptom of a society suffering moral decay
Men and women who alter, modify, or replace the original, relatively quiet, (OEM) factory-installed muffler legally affixed to their motorcycle, automobile, or pick-up truck, a federally regulated muffler that is manufactured to comply with the noise energy emissions safety mandates of CFR 40, Part 205 (total noise emissions of 80dB(A)), then proceed out onto a public roadway and employ that illegal noise energy to abuse, assault and consequently deny the rights of America’s most vulnerable e.g., the elderly, the handicapped, children, our families, these men and women are morally bankrupt, selfish, disrespectful, arrogant, thug-bullies. What type of person or personality type would illegally modify a motor vehicle to emit harmful, intrusive, noise energy and proceed to unlawfully employ that NOISE by entering into the home, places of work and worship, places of recreation, safe spaces, enjoyed and coveted by the American citizen?
Personality type…
Riding and driving LOUD in violation of CFR 40 Part 205 is a mental and spiritual illness rooted in unrestrained narcissism. Many who engage in riding and driving illegally LOUD, illegally equipped/modified, motor vehicles are simple minded idiots addicted to the “group dynamic,” some are simply stupid, selfish, hateful, people who are morally bankrupt due their immaturity, lawless by nature void a moral compass… but most pathetic are those who engage in this selfish, bully behavior who wear a “badge” of public trust or a judicial “robe,” carry a bar-card, or those entrusted to care for society as physicians of medicine and those who wear the Cross of Jesus’ suffering as colors on their “biker” jackets (“Christian” biker organizations) while simultaneously mocking the Gospel by riding LOUD and abusing the innocent in our society with illegal vehicular noise energy, the suffering, those for whom Jesus died thereby blasphemously rejecting the 2nd-Greatest Commandment and Romans 13 – vile hypocrites all.
Many of those who ride and drive LOUD proudly display the American Flag, claim to be honorable military veterans, proud “conservatives” not knowing that their godless behavior and mocking of the protective intent of the rule of law aligns and allies them with John Dewey’s Progressive Socialist Liberal Democrats and Vladimir Lenin’s “useful idiots.” The stupidity is mind numbing and almost laughable as these narcissistic vehicular NOISE thugs destroy daily quality of life for millions through unlawful NOISE intrusion, assault, a destruction of domestic tranquility.
Impotent, politically correct, compromised, law enforcement…
Unfortunately, America’s law enforcement community, over the previous 50-years, has become a cabal of sexually perverse (LGBTQAI++), reverse discriminatory (mandated hiring quotas-low moral/psychological and physiological standards, DEI, Affirmative Action, hyperactive IAD), WOKE, pacifist, politically correct, sociological experimentation, thereby making many police agencies and “peace” officers as useless as the tits on a boar hog. Law enforcement in the United States, especially in “blue” liberal jurisdictions, has lost its way thereby laying the foundation for societal dysfunction, socialistic endeavors.
My personal experience serving 31-years with the Houston Police Department
After having served as an infantryman in my beloved United States Marine Corps and attending undergraduate studies, I applied for and entered the Houston Police Department’s Training Academy in 1979. At that time, the Houston PD was a hard-charging, respected, law enforcement agency, the hiring process was stringent physiologically, psychologically, ethically and morally. According to an academy instructor, for every seat in my academy class there were 19-denied applications for employment. Personal ethics and morality were the primary focus of the hiring process; these personal attributes verified by incredibly stringent and intimidating preliminary interviews and a thorough polygraph examination; this, culminating with an extensive “background investigation” involving months of door-to-door investigative interviews of the applicant’s family members, former employers, coworkers and friends. The primary concern of those reviewing applications for employment with the Houston PD was, “Have you participated in anything, any conduct or behavior, that would embarrass and shame the integrity of the Houston Police Department should you be approved for employment?”
********************
WOKENESS, Political Correctness, Liberalism, Progressivism/Marxism, Moral Compromise, creeps into the Houston Police Department…
In 1983, with the advent of the Kathy Whitmire Administration in Houston and the Affirmative Action hire of Police Chief Lee P. Brown, the Houston Police Department began a downward spiral in morality, ethics, reverse racial discrimination via Affirmation Action mandates. With the advent of “Neighborhood Policing” protocols and the implementation of an overzealous Internal Affairs Division, the Houston PD incrementally and methodically morphed into a pacifist, WOKE, police agency where “good” officers were those who avoided negative citizenry contacts/interactions; in other words, those officers who did NOTHING proactive thereby avoiding internal affairs complaints and subsequent investigations were appreciated and praised by supervision.
This enforcement pacifism and impotency becoming necessary protocol as “due process protections,” concerning citizenry or supervisory allegations of policy infractions, were absent. The absence of due process protections to buffer unfounded, spurious, complaints/allegations, mandated, as a matter of occupational survival, that the officer “prove his innocence” beyond ANY doubt; therefore, an investigative conclusion/disposition of “unfounded” (no evidence of wrong doing, culpability) was essential if said officer was to avoid a permanent record of misconduct allegations, internal investigations, having been conducted, placed in his/her personnel file. By Department policy, subsequent a specific number of misconduct allegations (of any disposition other than perhaps “unfounded”) in a specified time frame resulted in a “Personnel Concerns Committee Review.” This serious review of an officer’s complaint history could possibly result in termination of employment with the Houston Police Department as the Personnel Concerns Panel/review was made policy as an alternative way for the HPD to terminate an officer’s employment via bypassing employment protections that shielded officers from retaliatory motives of a biased and compromised police administration.
This overzealousness by HPD’s Administration, their obsession with liability concerns, and their “yes” boys in the Internal Affairs Division, gave way to law enforcement impotence, apathy, laziness, a valid fear of engaging in any form of “proactive policing” essential to law enforcement effectiveness; therefore, the criminal thugs in Houston became emboldened as police routinely “look the other way” and refuse to engage the criminal element due to an absence of support from the upper echelon of the Houston Police Department; consequently, the citizenry unnecessarily suffers due to an absence of effective police service.
As one “old timer” patrolman/training officer would tell his rookie trainees as he parked his patrol vehicle in a remote wooded area facing an old tree away from public view: “You see that old tree over there, that’s MY tree…I come here everyday I’m on duty and I watch that tree grow and if you desire to complete twenty-years with this police department, you’ll find you a tree and watch it grow.” In other words, do nothing, say nothing, see nothing, don’t be an “over achiever,” take your calls-for-service, write your reports, turn your shop (patrol vehicle) in on time, go home and keep your mouth shut, that’s how you complete twenty successful years with the Houston Police Department…sad, but true.
********************
My experience having rejected the advice of the old training officer…
Subsequent 8-years of patrol duty involving assignments in uniformed street patrol and motorcycle patrol (Solo-Motorcycle Patrol Unit), I transferred to the Helicopter Patrol Division in 1989 where I served just under two-decades, 18-years as a commercial helicopter patrol pilot. During those two-decades in helicopter patrol, I had lost touch with the street officers I patrolled with in Houston’s Downtown Districts during the early 1980s; therefore, I was unaware of the liberal, WOKE, Progressive, changes that were manifesting within my Police Department. WOKE policies and agendas that warred against true, effective, police patrol work.
I routinely heard the “rumors” from patrol officers who visited the helicopter hangar at Hobby Airport, but I found their accusations and complaints difficult to believe. Then, in 2009, due to a heated disagreement relevant to proper protocol over the recovery of a downed helicopter, I ran afoul of a new, arrogant, supervisory administration assigned to the Helicopter Patrol Division and ultimately requested a transfer back to patrol duties. As an aside, the undo harassment I received from the new administration’s Captain concerning my transfer request to patrol and the “lesbian” Assistant Chief who appointed this new administration to the Helicopter Division was subtly disturbing. More on that later.
Subsequent months of enduring harassment from the new administration’s Captain assigned to the Helicopter Patrol Division, returning to uniformed patrol duties was indeed an eye-opening experience subsequent 19-years in the Air Support Division. What those patrolmen had been complaining about when visiting the helicopter hangar: HPD’s compromise with LGBTQ; the fear and concerns relevant to performing productive proactive police work and investigations; an overzealous Internal Affairs Division; an out-of-touch Police Administration, were indeed TRUE. The Houston PD of 2009 was NOT the Houston PD I had worked for over two-decades earlier as a patrol officer on the streets of Houston; but in all fairness, neither was the society that HPD was responsible for providing protection. Progressivism/Marxism; liberalism/atheism/secular humanism; sexual deviancy via pervasive moral relativism; rampant drug addiction; drug induced mental and spiritual illnesses; the weakening of the Biblical family unit; the absence of state-run mental institutions, these have all taken their toll on the City of Houston, Houston’s Police Department and the United States as a whole. America is a mentally and spiritually ill society. I am so very thankful to my LORD for having had the opportunity to experience a few years of actually performing police work before demonically rooted Progressivism-Liberalism-Marxism destroyed the job I love so very much. To this very day, I bleed blue.
The slippery slope of moral compromise via moral relativism…
My Houston PD had become a bastion of LGBTQIA++ compromise; DEI-Affirmative Action discrimination, hiring quotas – assignments based on sexual orientation-race; these inequities and unfairness inevitably fostered racial tension within the ranks. [The Houston PD literally stole my promotion to sergeant via Affirmative Action protocols costing me hundreds-of-thousands-of-dollars in income over the years; this, due solely to the color of my skin as they promoted unqualified Blacks and Hispanics, some of whom having never passed a promotional exam let alone achieved a promotable score.] A lowering of hiring standards, relevant to moral turpitude, allowing the mentally, morally, ethically and spiritually deceived to receive employment with the HPD as homosexuals, transsexuals, lesbians, were welcomed into the HPD, this compromise resulted in employee morale faltering throughout the Police Department. Quoting a patrol sergeant at HPD’s Westside Station, “Love the job-Hate the Department.” The Houston PD’s compromise with moral deviancy via the PRIDE/LGBTQ Marxist agenda, discriminatory DEI/Affirmative Action protocol, was and is interpreted as treasonous, unfaithfulness, unprofessionalism, traitorous, by the men and women who believe that the law enforcement community should be one of honor, dignity, morality, ethics, professionalism.
It is my understanding that certain applicants with “misdemeanor criminal histories” were also permitted to apply for employment with the Houston PD for positions in uniformed patrol. As if these insane policies were not sufficiently embarrassing, one male supervisor wanting to transition into a “female” reportedly had a penis-tuck surgery (gender reassignment surgery) performed in the Orient and returned to the Houston PD as a supervisor in drag. I personally observed this tall, rather large “man” in a dress as a “supervisor” of officers! The Houston Police Department had become something I no longer recognized or could identify with.
I voiced and physically demonstrated my disdain for LGBTQ sexual deviancy in the ranks of the Houston Police Department. I voiced my disappointment with my Department’s compromise with LGBTQ/DEI while forced to attend mandatory in-service training classes (sensitivity training), queer deviance stemming from mental and spiritual deception that was wearing the uniform, the badge, a weapon and allowed to police the streets of Houston, this queer deviancy was permitted in supervisory capacities as well. Furthermore, I protested the Department’s coercion that I attend class presentations by a lesbian speaker whose agenda was to sensitize the auditorium, filled to capacity with officers and supervisors, to the perversions and deceptive lifestyle of LGBTQIA++. I voiced my anger to the lesbian speaker that I was insulted that my police department would expect me to sit and listen to this perverted filth. I then proceeded to walk-out of the auditorium in demonstration to the deceptive and destructive policies undergirding moral and ethical compromise within the Houston Police Department. I’m sure this act of defiance did not set well with the Houston PD’s Administration.
My disdain and objections to my Department’s compromise with LGBTQ in the ranks of the HPD resulted in subtle forms of backlash/a subtle uneasiness from the morally and ethically compromised Police Administration. My “Assistant Chief” over the Helicopter Division was a lesbian; my Captain in patrol, subsequent my transfer from Helicopter Patrol, was a lesbian and rumored to be the lesbian lover of my former Assistant Chief. The subtle friction between the HPD and me was exacerbated by my concerted efforts to enforce City Ordinance 30-3 (Noisy Vehicles Generally) and Texas, 547-604 (Muffler Required), subsequent my transfer back to patrol duties in 2009.
********************
Motor vehicle noise enforcement, “the straw that broke the camel’s back,“
My patrol beat assignment in West Houston had, within its jurisdictional boundaries, a very popular “biker bar” known as “The Dam Ice House” (a LOUD, thug inundated, vulgar, drunken, biker bar that I’m proud to have assisted in its closure). Just outside my jurisdictional boundaries in Harris County, was another biker bar located on FM 1093/Westheimer Road extension. The abusively LOUD, mentally and spiritually ill, biker thugs who frequented these unscrupulous biker bars were/are operating illegally LOUD, illegally equipped, motorcycles in violation of CFR 40 Part 205, Houston City Ordinance 30-5, Texas State Muffler Statute 547.604 (Muffler Required).
These illegally LOUD, illegally equipped motorcycles are modified with noncompliant aftermarket exhaust mechanisms (not for road use exhausts-racing environments only as per the US EPA) emitting noise energy output that, in certain scenarios, is audible for one-statute mile under hard acceleration. Much to my amazement, no one, absolutely NO ONE, was doing anything about the unacceptable vehicular NOISE situation in Houston. Why are vehicular NOISE thugs allowed to bully and abuse society’s most innocent, our children, our elderly, our handicapped, our families, with impunity, day and night, and “law enforcement” looks the other way? Yes, we’ve already discussed that…
********************
Vehicular NOISE violations as lucrative probable cause, (illegal vehicular noise = aggressive driving behavior) – A commonsense approach…
During my enforcement of vehicular noise violations, I discovered that employing illegal vehicular noise as “probable cause” for a stop and investigate to be the most lucrative form of probable cause available to the average patrol officer. Employing vehicular NOISE as probable cause for a stop resulted in clearing via arrest/incarceration untold numbers of active warrants (felony and misdemeanor), arrests/incarcerations for driver’s license suspensions, citations for insurance and equipment violations. It is true that the personality-type of those who illegally modify a motor vehicle to emit dangerous, intrusive, illegal, noise energy is the very same personality type that possesses a propensity to offend in other areas of the law as well; therefore, narcissism, selfishness, are pervasive among those who abuse the citizenry with vehicular NOISE. Riding/driving LOUD is a “red flag” that the violator is a narcissistic thug-bully who cares NOTHING for the health and welfare, the daily quality of life, of his/her neighbor.
Additionally, for many years, Houston has been plagued with illegal street racing which far too often results in major accidents, fatalities, not to mention the destruction to daily/nightly quality of life due to the intrusive, illegal, vehicular noise. There is an inexorable link between illegal vehicular NOISE and aggressive driving behavior. The personality type that enjoys the narcissistically rooted attention garnered by a noisy vehicle also finds a dopamine high from street racing with other performance oriented, illegally modified, vehicles; therefore, commonsense suggests that employing illegal vehicular NOISE as probable cause for a stop, investigate, criminal history check, photos-audio, logging vehicle and operator information into a coordinated database, will have profound impacts on stymieing illegal racing, aggressive driving/riding, on the streets of Houston, Texas.
Why does law enforcement refuse to employ dangerous, intrusive, “vehicular noise” as probable cause for a stop and background investigation of the operator and passengers when applicable?
********************
Houston’s Leadership cowers in the presence of criminal bullies…
Illegally LOUD, illegally equipped, motorcycles, trucks, automobiles, inundated my beat assignment in west Houston, the citizenry, especially the most vulnerable to the illegal vehicular NOISE, were and continue to be audibly assaulted day and night, 24/7/365. My enforcement efforts to bring peace and lawful order, a quiet, peaceful, healthy, daily quality of life, to those citizens within my beat assignment were met with vitriol, angry rebuttal, vulgar and life-threatening comments, by thug, narcissistic, LOUD bikers, while “biker rights organizations,” such as the Motorcycle Riders Foundation (MRF), interceded on behalf of their donors in Washington DC; later, the MRF published lies about my retirement status in their newsletter seeking to disparage my professional reputation (letter/rebuttal below).
The “Texas Motorcycle Rights Association (TMRA)” did their part by writing a letter to Houston’s Mayor Parker accusing me of harassment and requesting that I be removed from enforcement (TMRA letter in attachment below); the local news media in Houston allied with the criminal LOUD biker thugs; the biased media waited outside my traffic court to interview bikers subsequent their adjudication relevant to illegal NOISE; business owners in Houston sympathized with the biker thugs fearing a loss of income/revenue if my enforcement initiative deterred biker access to retail establishments; biker thugs were and are glorified as some form of “patriot” when in reality, they’re bully thugs who abuse children with illegal NOISE.
My 99.9% conviction-rate on all vehicle noise emissions violations adjudicated in the municipal court system mandated extra HPD security in my traffic court; this, out of concerns for my personal safety during testimony due to threats of biker retaliation (biker comments URL below); consequently, my immediate supervision ran scared and confused; my Department’s upper echelon cowed to the concerns over liability/Constitutionality; the Mayor’s Office and the City Council ran scared of the aggressive LOUD biker thugs who rallied en masse at City Hall on two different occasions, threatening the City Council and Mayor with retaliation if my Constitutionally sound enforcement efforts were not stopped. I was prohibited by order from attending the biker rallies, protests, at Houston’s City Hall to explain my reasoning before the Council Members and Mayor for enforcing applicable vehicular noise laws. The upper echelon of the Houston PD, in its arrogance, refused to meet with me one-on-one to discuss my vehicular noise enforcement initiative and the Constitutionally sound reasoning for same (letter to Chief below). Cowards all.
Compromised Law Enforcement Personnel: Law Enforcement Biker Gangs
I had never, in my 31-years of service to the citizens of Houston, TX, seen such cowards and pacifists and compromised law enforcement personnel as I did during my years of vehicular NOISE enforcement in Houston. To my amazement, some of my most avid haters and detractors were law enforcement personnel who compromise their oath of office and their personal integrity by riding and driving illegally LOUD vehicles off duty, some were members of local law enforcement biker gangs. Sworn, accredited, law enforcement officers who dress, walk, talk, like thug biker gang members off-duty while they wear a badge and gun and patrol the streets of Houston, Harris County as law enforcement officers while on duty. These law enforcement biker thug organizations/gangs are present throughout the United States and nothing is done by their individual department leadership or the Federal Bureau of Investigations to stop the thug conduct of those who ride illegally LOUD, act and talk like biker trash, while employed as a public servant. This is unacceptable!
********************
Legal precedent ignites a fire fueling retribution…
My patrol Sergeant, who drove an illegally LOUD racing Corvette to 6AM roll call, ordered me to STOP enforcing the vehicular noise laws to which I rebutted and challenged his unlawful order with legal precedent, Aaron C. Aguilar v. State of Texas (2008); Aguilar provides legal precedent relevant to law enforcement’s right to stop and investigate loud motor vehicles based solely on an officer’s professional opinion as to the vehicle’s illegality due to a defective or illegal exhaust mechanism. Houston’s “City Legal” Department overturned the Sergeant’s unlawful order; this legal victory over my immediate supervision drove an unforgivable wedge between my NOISE enforcement efforts, my immediate supervision, the police administration; both, the Mayor’s office and the City Council; after all, who was this old patrol officer possessing the audacity to challenge the omnipotence of Houston’s Police Administration and supervision? How dare he! My enforcement of applicable vehicular noise laws was lawful and Constitutionally sound; therefore, HPD opted to place me on desk duty, repeatedly, to STOP my vehicular noise enforcement initiative seeing that I refused to stop citing and incarcerating, whenever possible, those who abuse the citizenry with unlawful vehicular NOISE energy.
********************
Houston PD’s Administration panders to the perjury of the LOUD Biker Cult[ure]…
Also, noteworthy concerning the cowardliness and apathy of the Houston Police Department’s Administration. Criminal, LOUD, thug, biker trash, at the behest of biker rights organizations in Texas and in Washington DC, were lining up at the citizen complaint intake at HPD’s Internal Affairs Division to file spurious, perjurious, false allegations of misconduct against me for having cited, arrested, incarcerated, those who willfully, with intent, abuse Houston’s most vulnerable, Houston’s most innocent, with illegal vehicular NOISE.
The biker rights organizations were made privy to Houston’s weak-link concerning “citizens complaints” and the tactic of employing same to undermine my lawful, constitutionally sound, vehicular noise enforcement initiative. As the false allegations began to stack-up requiring a mandatory response from me, over and over again, I submitted a request via my chain-of-command to criminally charge these individual bikers for perjury; after all, they had signed an affidavit that their allegations against me were true when audio and video evidence existed that exonerated me of these spurious and perjurious allegations of misconduct. In response to my request for intercession, Houston’s “Major Offenders Unit” began approaching the Harris County District Attorneys Office to file perjury charges against those bikers who had perjured themselves by swearing to false allegations of misconduct.
Shamefully, the Chief’s Office of the Houston PD interceded and stopped investigators from Houston’s Major Offenders Unit from filing perjury charges against the lying, deceiving, bikers stating that allowing these bikers to be charged with perjury might deter other citizens from filing complaints on officers for allegations of misconduct. In other words, to HADES with the false allegations against Officer Holtsclaw, we don’t care, Holtsclaw is expendable; to Hades with the rule of law; to Hades with the quality of life of Houston’s citizenry…allow the false allegations to stand and allow the LOUD bikers and LOUD auto and truck operators to abuse the citizenry at will.
********************
Enough was Enough…
The culmination of the shame I felt for serving a Police Department that compromised its integrity with the deviant immorality and mental illness of LGBTQIA++; the unfairness of DEI; having had my promotion to sergeant stolen through Affirmative Action mandates and having had the blatant reverse discrimination upheld by the 5th Circuit; having had lesbians placed over me in supervision in two separate divisions within the HPD; watching my immediate supervision, my Police Administration, the Mayor’s office, the City Council, run pathetically scared from biker rights organizations and cower to the threats from thug LOUD bikers in Houston; after having been repeatedly placed on desk duty pending LOUD bikers spurious allegations/complaints and the Administration’s cowardliness and refusal to stand with me and support my lawful efforts to provide intercession for the vehicular NOISE beleaguered citizen’s in Houston, my concerted efforts to make Houston’s streets safer and quieter; this, when personal audio and vehicle dash camera video/audio evidence existed to nullify the spurious allegations of untruthful bikers as “unfounded;” finally, my poor wife who had tolerated the stress, the harassment, the impotence of Houston’s leadership, we had enough of the pathetic, pacifist, nonsense; therefore, I honorably retired in 2011 with a broken heart remembering what my Houston Police Department was in 1980 and what it had become as of 2011 via Progressive WOKEISM. Cowards all. Houston, Texas has become the Sodom of the South, exemplified by its Montrose neighborhood and its celebration of sexual deviancy in its streets and within its own local government; unfortunately, the Houston PD has become a morally compromised version of exactly what Progressive-WOKE Houston deserves as its Law Enforcement entity. 31-years of service culminating in sadness and regret. I would not have succeeded void my LORD’s intercession.
********************
In closing, some advice to those seeking a career in law enforcement…
My professional recommendation to any young, aspiring, man or woman seeking an honorable and fulfilling career in law enforcement; especially those who honor Jesus as LORD. DO NOT seek employment in a liberal, politically blue, WOKE, pacifist, compromised, municipality, county or state law enforcement community; truth is, if you compromise yourself with a liberal jurisdiction, you’ll simply become another “useful idiot” in servitude to Leninist Marxism; liberal, anti-police, leadership will care NOTHING for you, you’re just a pawn for their “progressive” idiocy. You’re completely expendable, they don’t care about you or your family. Don’t waste your career serving the mentally and spiritually ill Democrat-Liberal-Progressive-Marxist.
If you desire to enter into law enforcement, do your homework, read reviews, talk with the officers of the jurisdiction in which you seek employment. If you’re going to dedicate your most productive years to a police department, make sure it is a department that represents your values, your ethics, a department that is truly concerned for the safety, welfare, daily quality of life, of the citizens you seek to serve with your life, your family, your precious time on this Earth. Serve in a department that actually honors the rule of law and “has your back” during those years of policing unpredictable, challenging, scenarios. Do not compromise YOU, your ethics, your family, for a paycheck.
Psychological Predictors of Environmentally Unsustainable Driving Behaviors: Schadenfreude and Preference for Loud Car Modifications: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10805
Parkinson’s Disease is skyrocketing and has doubled over the previous 30-years. New Study confirms that the exponential rise in Parkinson’s is directly related to TRAFFIC NOISE: https://youtu.be/huAx9Zy9CHU?si=rF3gtruDZs4r7SQR
Article by “National Library of Medicine” (NIH): “A desire for a loud car with a modified muffler is predicted by being a man and higher scores on psychopathy and sadism” : See: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10699294/
Misfeasance, Graft, by Governors and Mayors and the Judiciary…
As if the vehicular noise debacle is not already sufficiently pervasive, America’s governors, mayors, county commissioners, municipal city councils, law enforcement administrations, prostitute themselves with the vile and destructive community of vehicular noise morons via biker rallies and auto-truck shows where those sworn to protect the citizenry within their respective jurisdictions actually invite, en masse, the vehicular noise thugs into their jurisdictions in order to fill the local and state coffers with ill gotten gains via tax revenue; this, while the tax paying citizen and their family suffer day and night during the illegal, illegitimate, vulgar, drunken, narcotic abusing, gathering of NOISE idiocy.
This political whoredom is filthy misfeasance, malfeasance, graft, and nothing is done by Washington DC, the US EPA, the DOJ, to intervene and stop the idiocy…so the tax paying citizenry suffer in ignorance and pacifism, fear and cowardliness; this, while state and local vehicular noise laws, laws that mirror the protective intent of CFR 40 Part 205, exist within the respective state code as per the Supremacy Clause; but again, law enforcement, due compromise, ignorance, political correctness, laziness, does NOTHING to protect the citizenry from these vehicular NOISE bullies. An embarrassment – a nationwide tragedy for the suffering innocent, the vehicular noise beleaguered law abiding, man, woman, child; this, while our liberal, pacifist, judiciary treats the criminal element with kid gloves, weak adjudication, impotent sentencing, leading to never ending recidivism, and again, the citizenry suffers. Lenin’s “useful idiots” are running the circus that is American jurisprudence.
In Conclusion…
Personally, I absolutely loathe bullies and there exists few better examples of an “in your face” bully thug than those who abuse children, the elderly, the handicapped, our families, with illegal vehicular noise energy, night and day, relentless abuse in our urban areas. It would be refreshing to see these vehicular noise thugs escorted by angry dads and husbands into the city center, the britches of these vehicular NOISE thugs pulled down to their knees and subsequently bent over a tree stump, their belligerent, rude, arrogant, butts caned black and blue…but I digress. Let’s discuss the failures of law enforcement, the failures of our governors, mayors, failures of the US EPA, let’s discuss procedures, tactics, relevant to the pervasive abuse of illegal vehicular noise in the United States.
Article by “Car and Driver:” “People who like loud exhaust are psychotic”
Excerpt: The study made some strong remarks about the kind of people who would modify their car’s exhaust. If psychopathy and sadism aren’t bad enough, apparently loud truck owners would do even worse.
Article by “National Library of Medicine” (NIH): “A desire for a loud car with a modified muffler is predicted by being a man and higher scores on psychopathy and sadism”
Psychological Predictors of Environmentally Unsustainable Driving Behaviors: Schadenfreude and Preference for Loud Car Modifications: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/23/10805
(a) Low Speed Noise Emission Standard. Vehicles which are manufactured after the following effective dates shall be designed, built and equipped so that they will not produce sound emissions in excess of the levels indicated.
Effective date
Level
(i) January 1, 1979
83 dBA.
(ii) January 1, 1988
80 dBA.
(b) The standards set forth in paragraph (a) of this section refer to the sound emissions as measured in accordance with the procedures prescribed in § 205.54-1,2.
(c) Every manufacturer of a new motor vehicle subject to the standards prescribed in this paragraph shall, prior to taking any of the actions specified in section 10(a)(1) of the Act, comply with the other provisions of this subpart or Subpart A, as applicable.
Motorcycles
§ 205.152 Noise emission standards. Motorcycles
(a) Noise emission standards.
(1) Street motorcycles of the following and subsequent model years must not produce noise emissions in excess of the levels indicated:
(i) Street motorcycles other than those that meet the definition of § 205.151(a)(2)(ii):
Model year
A-weighted noise level (dB)
(A) 1983
83
(B) 1986
80
(ii) Street motorcycles that meet the definition of § 205.151(a)(2)(ii)(moped-type street motorcycles):
Model year
A-weighted noise level (dB)
(A) 1983
70
Motorcycle Labeling Requirements
§ 205.169 Labeling requirements. Motorcycles
(a) The manufacturer of any product (including the manufacturer of newly produced motorcycles) subject to this subpart must, at the time of manufacture, affix a permanent, legible label, or mark of the type and in the manner described below, containing the information provided below, to all such exhaust systems or exhaust system components to be distributed in commerce.
(b) The labels or marks shall be affixed in such a manner that they cannot be removed without destroying or defacing them, and must not be applied to any part which is easily detached from such product.
(c) The label or mark shall be in a readily visible position when the exhaust system or exhaust system component is installed on all motorcycles for which it is designed and marketed.
(d) All required language shall be lettered in the English language in block letters and numerals in a color that contrasts with its background.
(e) The label or mark must contain the following information:
(1) For exhaust systems subject to the noise emission standards of § 205.166:
(i) The label heading: Motorcycle Exhaust System Noise Emission Control Information;
(ii)
(A) For original equipment and replacement exhaust system, the following statement:
This (manufacturer’s name) exhaust system (serial number) meets EPA noise emission requirements of (noise emission standard) dBA for the following motorcycles: (list of model specific codes). Installation of this exhaust system on motorcycle models not specified may violate Federal law.
(B) For exhaust system components designed and marketed for motorcycles, and tested in accordance with § 205.168 as a constituent of a complete exhaust system comprising non-original equipment components (other than itself), as provided for in § 205.166(b)(3), the following statement:
This (manufacturer’s name) (type of component) (serial number), when installed with a legal (type of component), meets EPA noise emission requirements of (noise emission standard) dBA for the following motorcycles: (list of model specific codes). Installation of this exhaust system components on motorcycle models not specified may violate Federal law.
(iii) The model specific code must be the same as used by the motorcycle manufacturer and described in § 205.158(a)(6).
(2) For exhaust systems designed solely for use on competition motorcycles (as defined by § 205.151(a)(3) and so designated and labeled by the manufacturer), the statement:
This product is designed for use on closed course competition motorcycles only and does not conform to U.S. EPA noise emission standards. Used on motorcycles subject to EPA noise regulations constitutes tampering and is a violation of Federal law unless it can be shown that such use does not cause the motorcycle to exceed applicable Federal standards.
(3) For exhaust systems designed solely for use on motorcycles manufactured before January 1, 1982, the statement:
This product is designed for use on pre-1982 model year motorcycles only and does not conform to U.S. EPA noise emission standards. Use on motorcycles subject to EPA noise regulations constitutes tampering and is a violation of Federal law unless it can be shown that such use does not cause the motorcycle to exceed applicable Federal standards.
Acoustical Assurance Period
What about the “Acoustical Assurance Period” of 3730-miles? Can I legally remove my factory-installed muffler after the 3730-miles (or one-year) Acoustical Assurance Period (AAP) has expired?
Loud Biker advocates will tell you that the stock/OEM, quiet, factory-installed muffler is only “good” for 3730 miles or one-year from the time of retail/sale. NOT TRUE – the original, U.S. EPA approved, factory-installed muffler is intended to remain in compliance for the LIFE OF THE MOTORCYCLE according to the author of the AAP, Kenneth Feith (Former EPA Employee). The AAP is simply a “warranty period” required by the EPA from the manufacturer to the consumer to ensure the acoustical integrity of the factory-installed muffler…for more information, please see: “Noisy Motorcycles: An Environmental Quality-of-Life-Issue” (see Pages 2 & 19 or Ctrl F “Life of”) http://www.noisefree.org/Motorcyle-Report.pdf
What is “total” motorcycle noise emissions as evaluated in the SAE J331a Full-throttle drive-by testing procedure?
Answer: The motorcycle/model/sample seeking US EPA noise certification is tested in a controlled environment at 49.2-ft. on each side of the motorcycle as said motorcycle is accelerated at full-throttle on a predetermined path. The “total” motorcycle noise, that is…every moving part on the motorcycle under evaluation, is factored into the allowable noise emissions, NOT simply the muffler output alone; therefore, the muffler is actually emitting less than 80dB(A) in order for the test motorcycle to successfully pass the SAE J331a testing procedure for certification.
State Muffler Law and the Supremacy Clause
State Law, Municipal Ordinances, relevant to vehicular muffler law, proper wording of elements, must adhere to the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. The “Cliffs Notes” version of the Supremacy Clause mandates that State Law cannot be more lenient or permissive than Federal Law. As pertaining to vehicular noise enforcement and State Law, the State Traffic Code cannot be more lenient than what is mandated by the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 40 Part 205.
Many of the States require one or both of the following: “to prevent excessive or unusual noise” or “factory installed muffler.” With the Supremacy Clause in view, it is reasonable to suggest that a legal element requiring a muffler affixed to a motor vehicle “to prevent excessive or unusual noise” would be similar or identical to one requiring “the factory installed muffler;” this, due to the fact that the US EPA has clearly defined what is excessive or unusual noise by requiring a muffler that prevents sound energy emissions greater than 80dB(A). What is excessive and/or unusual noise emanating from a motor vehicle? Answer: Any motor vehicle louder than OEM, factory installed and this differentiation is easily made with the human ear by any law enforcement personnel with at least a modicum of experience in traffic enforcement or patrol.
Though some States convolute their muffler statutes and make them unnecessarily difficult or impossible to enforce due strict decibel limits, sound testing parameters, these States, for all intents and purposes, are in violation of the Supremacy Clause as it pertains to CFR 40 Part 205. How does a State know that their sound meter testing requirements coincide with the strict 80dB(A) mandate of CFR 40 Part 205 which is tested through the SAE J331a Full Throttle Motorcycle Testing Procedure? Requiring law enforcement to employ a sound meter in order to establish probable cause for a stop, cite, issuance of a citation or physical arrest and impoundment of the offending vehicle, ultimately results in nonenforcement due to costs, logistical problems with testing sites, sound meter certification requirements and certification of law enforcement in sound meter operation; this, in order to legally employ a sound meter device that adheres to adjudicatory requirements. Sound meter mandates for vehicular noise enforcement is fertile ground for defense attorney objections and case dismissals. This is nonsensical and completely unnecessary.
Aaron C. Aguilar v. State of Texas (2008) nullifies “void for vagueness” concerns by providing a police officer in the United States probable cause to stop, cite, investigate, any operator of a motor vehicle that said officer believes is in violation of State AKA Federal noise emissions law AKA any sound energy emitted by a vehicle that is LOUDER than what the OEM-Factory Installed muffler suppresses. It is lawful for a law enforcement officer to stop, investigate, cite, any operator of a motor vehicle that is emitting sound levels in excess of the OEM-Factory Installed muffler based solely on the officer’s professional opinion concerning what is excessive or unusual. Truth be told, even a child can differentiate the noise emissions from a legal, OEM factory-installed muffler and an illegal aftermarket exhaust. During my enforcement years with the Houston PD, I maintained a 99.9% conviction rate for all vehicular noise citations issued based solely on my observations and professional opinion that the motor vehicle in question was emitting sound energy that was “excessive and unusual.” If the exhaust under investigation was considered questionable, I did not cite the operator. I was blessed with a Magistrate that understood Houston’s City Ordinance (30-3) and the Texas State Law (547.604) and the legal element of “to prevent excessive and unusual noise.”
It is my professional opinion that should any State desire to employ sound meter testing protocol into their State Law concerning vehicular noise enforcement that they take advantage of the SAE J2825 Stationary Testing Procedure which I believe closely duplicates what the more extensive and costly SAE J331a procedure produces which is required by the US EPA for testing noise emissions for all street-use motorcycles seeking US EPA authorization/certification. It is my professional opinion that the US EPA could resolve vehicular noise enforcement legal questions by embossing, labeling, all compliant, OEM-factory installed, mufflers for motorcycles as well as automobiles and trucks. An inspection label clearly and easily accessed by enforcement on motor vehicle mufflers, like those required for motorcycle mufflers, would serve as prima facie evidence relevant to the muffler’s legality. Tampering and illegal muffler inserts like the MagnaFlow, Flowmaster, BORLA, inserts into a muffler’s exhaust system are easily identifiable through sound emissions and visual inspection.
As a final note, concerning motorcycle noise enforcement, it is prima facie evidence that a muffler affixed to a street-use motorcycle that is absent the required US EPA muffler label is operating illegally LOUD and is in violation of applicable State and Federal Law; of course, the inspecting officer should be on guard concerning tampering and altering of the OEM-factory installed muffler making it illegally loud; tampering that involves the removal of baffling or manipulating the OEM muffler’s internals though discreet cutting and welding. Spotting tampering of OEM-factory installed mufflers can be an art and comes with experience in such enforcement but differentiating sound emissions between the OEM-factory installed muffler and an illegal aftermarket exhaust is obvious as the illegal noise emissions of an OEM-factory installed muffler that has undergone tampering.
************************************
Illegally LOUD motor vehicles and Patriotic Conservatism? Hypocrisy defined!
As a Christian Conservative, former US Marine Infantryman, retired 31-year veteran of the Houston PD, I choose to stand in defense of the mom, the child, the elderly, the handicapped, our families, throughout the United States who are abused, harassed, threatened, intimidated, by a narcissistic, disrespectful, arrogant, lawless, segment of our mentally and spiritually ill American society; that is, those who choose to illegally modify a motorcycle, automobile, truck, to emit vehicular NOISE greater than the legal, relatively quiet, safe, OEM factory-installed muffler in violation of the protective intent of CFR 40 Part 205 enacted for the protection of the health and welfare, daily quality of life, of the American citizen.
There is absolutely NOTHING “conservative” or “patriotic” about abusing America’s most innocent with illegal vehicular NOISE. Though the US EPA, President Reagan (delegated vehicular noise enforcement authority to the States), both Bush administrations, Bill Clinton, the Obama—Biden and Trump administrations, state leadership, and their law enforcement community have miserably failed the vehicular-noise-beleaguered citizen, I choose to stand against America’s narcissistic bullies who offend and mock the laws enacted to protect our most innocent from the physiological and psychological harm done through the unencumbered operation of illegally LOUD, illegally equipped motor vehicles operated on America’s public roadways.
Though our representatives are compromised by their subservience to vehicular noise lobbyists, and though our law enforcement community is compromised by its participation in the Loud Vehicle Cult[ure], both in an on-duty and off-duty status, I choose to stand, and if my stance is offensive to you, so be it. You who advocate for, participate in, the vehicular noise abuse of our most innocent are mentally and spiritually ill; your mental illness is rooted in unrestrained narcissism and selfishness. Those who remain silent while our most innocent are abused daily and nightly by vehicular noise terrorists, if you’re uninformed, please get informed and get involved by speaking out and contacting your representatives; if you’re informed and knowledgeable and you do nothing, you are a coward. Vehicular NOISE abuse is out of control in the United States; it’s time the narcissistic vehicular noise bully be stopped!
” Steel Horse Motorcycle Rally, ” Fort Smith, Arkansas….child protecting her ears due to the unlawfully loud motorcycles in attendance…shame on her parents, but more shameful are those who abuse this child with illegal motorcycle noise and the Mayor and the Governor and the Attorney General who not only allow it but prostitute themselves with the vehicular NOISE thugs via “Biker Rallies” and “Car Shows” for tax revenue and the city coffer while the innocent tax-payer suffers. Arkansas AR Code § 27-37-601 requires the relatively quiet factory installed muffler or one duplicating factory specifications, part (b) of this statute prohibits the sale/retail of aftermarket exhausts in Arkansas that do not comply with quiet, factory installed muffler specifications yet Governor Sanders and her Attorney General, the Arkansas State Police, do absolutely NOTHING to enforce these laws enacted for the protection of the citizenry in Arkansas. This is misfeasance, malfeasance, nonfeasance by Arkansas’ public officials! Governors, Mayors, State Attorneys General, State Law Enforcement Officials, across the United States are as guilty of nonfeasance as Arkansas’ leadership; this, as vehicular noise thugs rule our roadways and abuse the American citizen with impunity.
R.D. Holtsclaw, Houston PD Solo Motorcycle Detail ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Aggressive Driving and Illegal Vehicular NOISE – a deadly inextricable link ignored by law enforcement – WHY?
Are our Federal and State Legislators; our Governors and their State Attorney General; our Mayors and City Councils; our County Commissioners, financially compromised with the illegal Aftermarket Exhaust manufacturing Industry, Motorcycle “Rights” Organizations, their lobbyists? Is political greed, graft, compromise, circumventing enforcement and consequently destroying our daily quality of life, recklessly endangering our health and welfare?
Why can’t those in positions of authority, leadership, legislation, enforcement, recognize the causal, inextricable, link between riding and driving illegally LOUD and aggressive, dangerous, driving behavior on our public roadways that far too often results in serious injury or a fatality?
Fact: Driving-Riding illegally LOUD is inextricably linked to aggressive driving behavior. Stop the illegal vehicular NOISE = substantial reduction in aggressive driving = exponential reduction in traffic fatalities.
Question/Discussion,
It is beyond reasoning and understanding why those responsible for providing protection, intercession, from aggressive vehicular thugs, those who seek to abuse the American citizen with illegal vehicular NOISE and aggressive driving behavior cannot discern the undeniable link, cause and effect, between deadly aggressive driving behavior and illegal vehicular NOISE.
If those tasked with providing protection for the American citizen operating a motor vehicle upon America’s public roadways would take the initiative to ensure, mandate, enforcement of Federal, State and Local vehicular NOISE laws, serious traffic accidents and traffic fatalities would be greatly reduced.
If those tasked with providing the American motorist protection would mandate that law enforcement employ illegal vehicular NOISE as lawful “probable cause” for a stop and investigate as per “Aaron C. Aguilar v. State of Texas (2008),” the overwhelming majority of those who drive and ride aggressively on our public roadways would be stopped, cited, their names entered into a Federal, State, database with a permanent record useful for future critical traffic oriented incidents, liability and license suspensions/revocations.
Today’s vehicular NOISE abuse is Yesterday’s smoking in public places – and – just as physiologically injurious to the cardiovascular system relevant to stress related illnesses
Today’s vehicular NOISE is yesterday’s smoking in public places. Educating our local, county, state, legislators concerning the physiological harm done and the destruction to daily quality of life can change things and lobbying our representatives at the federal level can initiate financial coercion upon the states to comply with CFR 40 Part 205, motorcycle muffler labeling and safe 80dB(A) mandates delegated to the States by Congress for enforcement. Doing NOTHING ensures failure….at least make a stand for what is right and protect our most innocent from vehicular NOISE abuse.
Noncompliant aftermarket exhausts on motor vehicles operating in violation of CFR 40 Part 205 and State muffler laws that mirror the protective intent of the Code of Federal Regulations DO NOT belong on our public roadways but on closed-course racing environments ONLY.
Physiological Dangers of Unregulated Motor Vehicle Noise – the realm of physics and commonsense…
Please, take a moment and consider the following statement by a Mr. Charles Lang, Physics Instructor…
I’m glad someone brought up the issue of the impact and measurement of sound levels. Yes, this is a scientific measurement of sound levels which are, by design and implementation, measures of air pressure variations. A commonly used unit of air pressure is the Pascal (in honor of Blaise Pascal, the father of fluid dynamics). It is sometimes confused with sound power measurements (energy, watts over time). Both are logarithmic (exponential) mathematically and somewhat perceptibly. Thus a six deciBel (honoring Alexander Graham Bell) increase in pressure is a 4x increase in power. I could go in to much more detail but this isn’t the forum to do so. I have taught the physics of sound at a college level, and have spent much of my academic career studying it.
Back to the point, Measurement and effect are somewhat different. Now I’m being academic. The common (legally) used scale for noise measuring instrumentation is “A” weighted, meaning that it accounts for the statistical interpretation of what humans are most sensitive to. I, personally and professionally, don’t agree that an “A” weighted scale tells the whole story. I’m alone in that assessment as far as the EPA and other regulators. This is why I differ. The human sensory system is designed for survival of the species. When we hear a roar (low frequency energy diminished by the “A” weighted instrument), it does not reflect our visceral response. Our adrenal glands produce cortisol designed for “flight or fight”. We haven’t yet evolved beyond that. This human response is well known. Our bloodstream is inundated with a hormone designed to keep us safe. Unmuffled vehicles produce energy below what our ears perceive Yet our body does. It’s known as infrasound. Our military is very aware of this phenomena. We’re wired for it!
Noise is power in every sense, literally and figuratively, and should be minimized such that when it’s necessary for survival it’s useful. Otherwise, it’s like Aesop’s fable of continually “crying wolf”. It eventually loses its innate usefulness. Then we die! Mostly from stress related illness, like the number one killer in America, heart disease.I am so perplexed as to why three percent of the population (or less) [the Loud Motorcycle Culture] has this much power over our lives. Man, I could go on…as I type this… unmuffled motorcycles, trucks, et al invade my domicile and my mind, with such a stupid, selfish, idiotic declaration of their perceived freedom. Not to mention our political representatives who blindly support them, cynically, for campaign donations. Sorry Rick, but showing me how evil they are…well, my outrage meter is broken. I have a dark heart today!
Illegal Vehicular Noise – A Nationwide Plague upon the American Citizen – Solutions?
Protection is the number-one responsibility of Government. The US Congress delegated authority, responsibility, concerning enforcement of the protective intent of US EPA CFR 40 Part 205 to the individual States, the Governor, State Attorney General, State Law Enforcement, Local Law Enforcement. Pervasive evidence spanning the previous forty-years confirms that State and Local enforcement relevant to abusive, illegal, vehicular NOISE has been an abysmal failure. What can be done?
The US Congress and the US EPA must pass legislation restricting or denying transportation funding/grants to any State that refuses to aggressively enforce violations of the protective intent of CFR 40 Part 205 of the Code of Federal Regulations as it pertains to vehicular noise emissions and labeling of mufflers. CFR 40 Part 205, vehicular noise restrictions requiring total vehicular noise emissions not exceed a relatively safe 80dB(A) for street-use motorcycles, automobiles, light-medium duty trucks.
The US Congress and the US EPA must pass legislation requiring States to initiate an annual vehicular safety inspection program and as part of that vehicular safety inspection, the muffler/exhaust mechanism affixed to those vehicles undergoing inspection must be examined for compliance with the protective mandates of CFR 40 Part 205. State Law, relevant to motor vehicle mufflers and noise emissions, must be worded with legal elements that conform to the OEM-factory installed mandates of CFR 40 Part 205; this, in compliance with the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.
The US Congress and the US EPA must demand that the States take civil and criminal action against those companies who manufacture, distribute, retail, install, aftermarket exhaust mechanisms for motor vehicles; specifically, those motor vehicles to be operated upon the public roadways of the United States, that do NOT conform to the safety mandates of CFR 40 Part 205 concerning NOISE energy emissions and proper labeling of mufflers for street-use motorcycles. Any exhaust manufacturer refusing to comply with CFR 40 Part 205 should be civilly sued into insolvency and criminally charged relevant to their contributions to the vehicular noise abuse of the American citizen. Illegal vehicular noise is sound energy and is a physical assault upon the American citizen that destroys daily quality of life and recklessly endangers the health and welfare of anyone exposed to same.
The US Congress and US EPA, as part of their agreement with the States concerning transportation funding/grants, must insist that the operators of illegally equipped motor vehicles, illegally LOUD motor vehicles in violation of CFR 40 Part 205, be subject to a progressive increase in fines with continuing violations resulting in arrest, incarceration, impoundment of the noncompliant vehicle until such time arrangements are made to return said vehicle to an OEM-factory installed condition.
The US Congress and US EPA must provide oversight relevant to Governor and Mayoral prostitution, graft, misfeasance, malfeasance, compromise, with members of the LOUD Motorcycle, Auto, Truck, Cult[ure] where State and Local Government leadership invites into their State and/or Municipality operators of illegally LOUD motor vehicles for shows, rallies, where the citizenry of those States, Municipalities, are audibly abused, day and night, by the attendees operating motor vehicles that do not comply with the protective intent of CFR 40 Part 205 and applicable State muffler laws relevant to vehicular noise emissions.
Every State must acknowledge a law enforcement officer’s legal right to use suspected illegal vehicular NOISE as lawful “probable cause” to stop, cite, investigate the operator of said suspect vehicle; this, in accordance with Texas Court of Appeals case “Aaron C. Aguilar v. State of Texas (2008).” https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/fourth-court-of-appeals/2008/20953.html Aaron C. Aguilar v. State of Texas (2008) does provide a law enforcement officer the authority to determine what is “excessive and unusual noise” emanating from a motor vehicle.
The US Congress and US EPA can easily expedite State enforcement of State muffler laws duplicating the protective intent of CFR 40 Part 205 (80dBA) by mandating an inspection muffler label for all compliant mufflers as currently required for motorcycle mufflers on street-use motorcycles. Stamping, heavily embossing, a US EPA muffler label in a readily visible location for inspection by enforcement officials will act as prima facie evidence of a muffler’s compliance. Of course, tampering will remain a concern as will illegal products inserted into the exhaust mechanism such as Flowmaster, Magnaflow, BORLA, exhaust inserts. Tampering and illegal inserts are easily discernable due the sound energy emitted by the offending exhaust mechanism. Currently, manufacturers of illegal aftermarket exhaust mechanisms are distributing “sound-on/sound-off” options that allow an operator the ability to manipulate noise emissions on the fly thereby concealing their illegality when law enforcement is present.
How are illegal, noncompliant, manufacturers like “Big Dog” motorcycles allowed to exist in the United States? Where is our US Attorney General and the US Environmental Protection Agency?
Attorney General Todd Blanche, US EPA Director Lee Zeldin, why are these illegal, criminally conspiratorial, manufacturers, distributors, retailers, installers, of illegally LOUD, noncompliant, aftermarket exhaust mechanisms, and hundreds if not thousands like them, allowed to thrive and prosper in the United States? CFR 40 Part 205 violations!
Biker Gang Activity – Effectively Castrating the Bane of any civil society
If the United States Federal Government, the FBI, DEA, ATF, HSI; If a State Law Enforcement entity, Department of Public Safety, Highway Patrol, desires to SHUT DOWN Biker Gang criminal activity, the most expedient solution is employing “illegal motor vehicle noise” as lawful probable cause for a STOP and INVESTIGATE, cite the LOUD biker for violations of State Muffler Law, State Law which mirrors the protective intent of CFR 40 Part 205; then, impound the offending vehicle and maintain custody of the illegally equipped motorcycle until such time arrangements are made to return the noncompliant vehicle to an OEM, Factory Installed, legal, condition i.e., a factory installed, quiet, safe, muffler system that is properly labeled and affixed to said motorcycle.
Biker Gangs in the United States, and Biker Gangs around the World, worship at the throne of narcissism which is under girded and exemplified primarily by their illegal motorcycle NOISE accompanied by a silly façade of false bravado, vulgarity, hedonism, arrogance. Motorcycle NOISE is the GOD of the Biker Gang member, take that away, humble the Biker Gang Member by arrest and impounding their god, you will essentially castrate the Biker Gang’s raison d’etre.
Some introductory questions for those who ride and drive LOUD,
1) Loud motor vehicles are abusive…when did a man or woman acquire the “right” or “privilege” to abuse children, the elderly, the handicapped, with illegal motor vehicle noise by operating an illegally equipped, illegally LOUD, motorcycle, auto, truck, on our public roadways?
2) When did it become acceptable and fashionable to destroy the quality of life of thousands of families, daily, for one’s own selfish, narcissistic, pleasure?
3) Who invited you, LOUD biker, LOUD auto and truck, bully, into our home, places of work, worship, education and recreation?
4) To those who ride and drive illegally LOUD. Why can’t you humble yourself, obey the federal and state muffler laws enacted for the protection of the whole of society? Why can’t you be kind and thoughtful, respecting our children, our elderly, our handicapped, our families, by riding and driving lawfully with the quiet, safe, 80dB(A) OEM factory-installed muffler?
Vehicular NOISE as lawful Probable Cause for Law Enforcement – A GOLD MINE OF OPPORTUNITY
During my 31-years in law enforcement, I discovered vehicular noise enforcement to be one of the most lucrative forms of “probable cause” for a “stop and investigate” as those who abuse the general public via the operation of an illegally equipped, illegally LOUD, motor vehicle upon our public roadways is oftentimes the same narcissistic, irresponsible, belligerent, personality-type that offends in other areas of the law where felony and misdemeanor warrants, license suspensions, are commonplace; therefore, rejecting illegal vehicular NOISE as probable cause by law enforcement further demonstrates the impotency and compromise prevalent in our pathetically WOKE enforcement entities today.
Also, very relevant to Law Enforcement, a police officer does NOT need a sound meter device to enforce motor vehicle noise laws where the State Law elements include universal verbiage such as “to prevent excessive or unusual noise” or the law requires the “factory installed muffler or a muffler that duplicates the sound suppression requirements of the factory installed muffler.” See: Texas State Court of Appeals case “Aaron C. Aguilar v. State of Texas (2008).” https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/fourth-court-of-appeals/2008/20953.html
During my vehicular noise enforcement initiative in Houston, Texas, I was not permitted to employ a sound meter device for enforcement as the legal elements for same were not present in City Ordinance 30-3 nor were the legal elements present in Vernon’s Civil Statute, Texas 547,604. Though I made a request to employ the SAE J2825 Stationary Sound Meter Test for evidentiary testimony enhancement at trial, my Department would not authorize it; fortunately, I was blessed with a caring and concerned Magistrate who understood the legal ramifications of “Aaron C. Aguilar v. State of Texas (2008)” and confided in my professional experience and my ability to discern obvious violations of Ordinance 30-3 and Texas 547,604 which resulted in a 99.9% conviction rate on all vehicular noise violations brought before the Court.
The LOUD Biker Cult[ure] and their supporters, like the “Motorcycle Riders Foundation” in Washington D.C., were so enraged by my vehicular noise enforcement initiative that extra security was required in my court hearings to protect me from the biker cult that sat behind me awaiting adjudication before the Court. Despite my Department’s WOKE cowardliness and fears of civil retribution by the LOUD biker cult[ure] and various biker organizations around the United States, it was possible to cite, arrest, convict, the LOUD vehicle abuser using vehicular NOISE as probable cause for the stop; this, void a sound meter device. Vehicular NOISE is an incredibly lucrative form of PC for law enforcement that is sorely and shamefully overlooked by most patrol and enforcement officers.
Aaron C. Aguilar v. State of Texas (2008) does provide a law enforcement officer the authority to determine what is “excessive and unusual noise” emanating from a motor vehicle apart from sound meter devices. Any competent, relatively experienced, law enforcement officer can easily discern or differentiate noise emissions from a legal, quiet, factory installed muffler from NOISE emitted by an illegally LOUD aftermarket exhaust or an exhaust system that has been interrupted by an illegal “FlowMaster,””Borla” or “Magnaflow” type device or a slip-on aftermarket canister on motorcycle exhausts. Also, motorcycle muffler labeling requirements as per CFR 40 Part 205 is prima facie evidence of a motorcycle muffler’s legality or illegality. KNOW THE LAW!
The impotent mantra, obfuscation, often cited by the narcissist who abuses their fellow citizens with illegal motorcycle noise is “I ride LOUD because Loud Pipes Save Lives.” Personally, having owned some 30-motorcycles since age 12 and having ridden professionally for years, Loud Pipes Save Lives is a lie, it’s obfuscation for illegal, abusive, behavior as illegally loud exhausts make the rider less safe through exponentially increased rider fatigue; through inadvertently invoking a “fight or flight response” from adjacent operators of motor vehicles who make unpredictable avoidance maneuvers when startled by the illegal, intrusive, noise while passing and white-lining under acceleration; also, the illegally loud exhausts stymie the warning sirens of approaching emergency motor vehicles creating a hazardous scenario for the motorcyclist as well as every motor vehicle operator, bicyclist, pedestrian, in their vicinity; this, as they approach a busy intersection.
For all intents and purposes, in order for LOUD exhausts on motorcycles to be effective for safety concerns, the exhaust would have to be pointed forward where 75%+ of motorcycle hazards exist; specifically, vehicles turning left into the path of the approaching motorcycle; therefore, bright colored clothing, operating with headlight on, wearing a DOT approved motorcycle helmet, are actual safety measures, not illegal NOISE.
Loud Biker Thuggery and the US EPA – a historical perspective…
Illegally LOUD biker thuggery has been around for many decades and in response, Congress passed the Noise Control Act in 1972. In 1983, the US EPA, due to public health and daily quality of life concerns, restricted motorcycle noise emissions to a “total” motorcycle noise output of 83dB(A) and in response to continued testing, the US EPA then opted to reduce motorcycle noise output to 78dB(A). Hearsay suggests that Suzuki Motors complained that the 78dB(A) restriction would be cost prohibitive; therefore, the EPA compromised and settled on a total motorcycle noise output of 80dB(A) in model year 1986 and every street-use motorcycle muffler going forward was and is mandated to conform to the strict testing requirements of the SAE J331a full-throttle motorcycle testing procedure where every make and model of street-use motorcycle manufactured in the United States was/is to be tested at full-brake horsepower at 42-feet on each side of the motorcycle; said motorcycle under noise output evaluation cannot exceed 80dB(A), a “total motorcycle noise output” of 80dB(A) as per CFR 40 Part 205 in order to be retailed and operated in the United States.
Once that motorcycle make and model passed the US EPA testing mandates, the factory muffler affixed to same was to be permanently and heavily embossed with a specific US EPA muffler label that was to be in plain view for inspection by authorities and attached to the frame of the motorcycle (usually the downtube on cruisers) is another US EPA label that matches that EPA-approved muffler to the motorcycle and clearly articulates that any modification to the muffler which would increase noise output is prohibited; also, that frame label designates at what RPM (max brake horsepower) the motorcycle was tested and met the 80dB(A) restriction.
Unfortunately, enforcement of the Federal Law concerning motorcycle noise was delegated to the States during the Reagan Administration and the States and local municipalities, their Governors and Mayors and Law Enforcement Community, have been abysmal failures and illegal motorcycle noise, illegal manufacturing of “not for road use” aftermarket exhausts for retail, the operation of illegally loud motorcycles on our public roadways, has grown exponentially and 80%+ of every narcissistic thug operating a large displacement motorcycle in the United States rides with an illegal aftermarket exhaust that emits in multiples (logarithmic) the total, legal, 80dB(A) as these hedonistic thugs abuse our children, the elderly, our handicapped, veterans suffering PTSD, our families, with illegally LOUD, dangerously intrusive, motorcycle noise; this, as our police are too compromised and too cowardly to stand in the gap for the abused citizenry and cite these NOISE thugs, incarcerate them if necessary subsequent repeated offenses, and impound the illegally LOUD piece of vibrating junk until it is returned to OEM-factory noise levels. This vehicular noise abuse is shamefully permitted by those sworn to protect us from same.
The United States Congress…
In addition, our Federal Government “should” care about unlawful motor vehicle noise seeing that they are the entity which warned, over a generation ago, of the negative physiological/psychological effects of unregulated environmental noise, specifically transportation noise, in a “Congressional Statement” associated with the Noise Control Act of 1972. It was Congress who advised the American citizen that unregulated environmental noise would require a “national uniformity of treatment.” It was Congress who delegated noise enforcement responsibility to the States and Local Government in the Noise Control Act of 1972 yet our Federal Government has provided zero enforcement oversight while law enforcement nonfeasance/non-enforcement has been pervasive for some four-decades. How much more applicable are those Congressional concerns today subsequent to the exponential growth of unregulated motor vehicle noise since the enactment of the 1972 Noise Control Act? Where is the care and concern from our Congressional Representatives relevant to pervasive, illegal, motor vehicle noise currently destroying the quality of life of many millions of American citizens on a daily basis? United States Congress, where are you?
42 U.S. Code § 4901 – Congressional findings and statement of policy – Noise Control Act – 1972
(b) The Congress declares that it is the policy of the United States to promote an environment for all Americans free from noise that jeopardizes their health or welfare.
To that end, it is the purpose of this chapter to establish a means for effective coordination of Federal research and activities in noise control, to authorize the establishment of Federal noise emission standards for products distributed in commerce, and to provide information to the public respecting the noise emission and noise reduction characteristics of such products.
(a) The Congress finds—
(1) that inadequately controlled noise presents a growing danger to the health and welfare of the Nation’s population, particularly in urban areas;
(2) that the major sources of noise include transportation vehicles and equipment, machinery, appliances, and other products in commerce; and
(3) that, while primary responsibility for control of noise rests with State and local governments, Federal action is essential to deal with major noise sources in commerce control of which require national uniformity of treatment.
Riding and Driving LOUD – A form of Mental Illness
A man or woman who chooses to remove or alter the legal, relatively quiet, safe, factory installed muffler on their motor vehicle, a muffler that conforms to the protective mandates of Code of Federal Regulations CFR 40 Part 205 and replace that legal muffler or illegally tamper with the sound suppression qualities of that muffler to make same LOUDER; then, proceed out onto a public roadway and, with intent, abuse, bully, children, the elderly, the handicapped, our families, with that illegal vehicular noise, this antisocial behavior is indicative of a mental and spiritual illness rooted in unrestrained narcissism, selfishness, disrespect, for the American citizen; with emphasis, disrespect and disregard for the health and welfare of our most innocent. A choice made to engage in conduct that destroys the daily quality of life of millions, a behavior that criminally audibly-assaults children, our families, with illegal vehicular noise energy is indicative of a serious mental illness in which law enforcement is obligated to intercede.
Playing “dress up” as an adult?
During my many years of riding motorcycles for pleasure, commuting, touring, riding professionally as a motorcycle officer, I observed a rather humorous yet sad phenomenon prevalent within the LOUD Biker Cult[ure] and that is the embarrassing act of playing “dress up” in order to ingratiate oneself with those who worship vehicular NOISE as a form of religious icon and tool of intimidation. Young and old alike, men-women, donning organizational or gang colors affixed to leather jackets, arms-chest-neck-face-hands-legs tatted with demonic, radical, images of narcissistic nonsense. A “look” of “badass” ever present upon their face with vulgar, LOUD, language to bolster the “thug gang” façade; these, destroying daily quality of life for millions, recklessly endangering our most innocent physiologically with intrusive, illegal, NOISE; this, void remorse or reflection.
For those law abiding motorcycle riders who seek to respect the sport of motorcycling, the LOUD Biker Cult[ure] is an ever present embarrassment. The Loud Biker Cult[ure] is an ever present example of what parental failure manifests in our society and what law enforcement apathy and compromise perpetuates.
Further evidence of mental illness prevalent among the LOUD vehicle cult in America
Loud Biker Comment:Don Herbert 04 September 2018: Hey Rick Holtsclaw you are a complete fucking ass hat aren’t there allot more important things that need to be fixed in this world !!! I think you really are in desperate need of a life loser !!!
Loud Biker Comment: John Sheriff 15 October 2017: “Gag gag on your mans cock… fucking queer.”
Loud Biker Comment: Phil McAfee“Hey Rick, Too bad you didn’t take one in the face while you were on duty. Its not to late for us to hope.”
Loud Biker Comment: Mohammed Jihad “Fuck your children fuck you elderly and fuck your family go fuck your mother’s grave you fucking scumbag.”
Loud Biker Comment: John, 12 July 2017: Die in a fire, Rick, you unAmerican, fascist piece of shit. I mean that with nothing but love, of course.
Loud Biker Comment: Brian Mackenzie 16 July 2017: I put the loudest pipes I could get on my bike because fuck you and my neighbors.
Using illegal vehicular NOISE as an instrument of assault
I can’t recall the number of times I have walked along a public pathway adjacent to a public roadway in a municipality or nature park when vehicular noise thugs operating an illegally equipped, illegally LOUD truck, automobile, motorcycle, have intentionally revved their motor to incredible dB(A) levels and abused, assaulted, my wife, children, the general public, with physiologically dangerous NOISE energy; this, simply to intimidate and terrorize. This too is a form of mental and spiritual illness that unfortunately goes unaddressed by our law enforcement community, law enforcement who is ignorant of state and federal muffler laws, muffler law enforcement, they are far too compromised, lazy, apathetic, to intercede on behalf of the vehicular noise beleaguered citizenry.
Vehicular noise abuse has become so prevalent within American society that an uninformed, unsuspecting, unaware, public, naively believes intrusive and physiologically injurious motor vehicle noise is legal, acceptable, while this same naïve populous suffers ever increasing rates of cardiovascular stress related illnesses and destruction to daily quality of life…a direct physiological consequence of unregulated, unencumbered, illegal motor vehicle noise on America’s public roadways.
A brief word about Motorcycle Rallies in the United States
Motorcycle rallies are illegal due to violations of CFR40 Part 205 as 80%+ of the motorcycles present at these rallies are illegally equipped, illegally LOUD, in violation of the 80dB(A) total noise emissions mandates (SAE J331a testing procedure) and these aftermarket exhausts are absent the required labeling mandated by the US EPA.
Mayors and Governors and law enforcement officials who prostitute, compromise, themselves with the Loud Biker Cult[ure], Loud Auto and Truck Cult[ure], at the expense of the health and welfare, daily quality of life, of the citizens audibly assaulted, abused, by these narcissistic morons should be civilly sued and criminally indicted.
STOP ABUSING THE INNOCENT TAX-PAYING CITIZENRY AND THEIR CHILDREN WITH ILLEGAL MOTOR VEHICLE NOISE IN ORDER TO SUPPLEMENT YOUR MUNICIPAL AND STATE COFFERS WITH TAX REVENUE ILLEGALLY GARNERED FROM ABUSIVE VEHICULAR NOISE THUGS WHO AUDIBLY ASSAULT, ABUSE, CHILDREN, THE ELDERLY, OUR HANDICAPPED, OUR FAMILIES!
To the Vehicular NOISE Thugs who cite “We the people” as a defense to their abuse of the American citizen…
“We the people” defends the rule of law, the Bill of Rights, the enactment of laws that are in the best interest of the whole, not a narcissistic hoard of NOISE thugs who illegally modify their motor vehicle to emit dangerous noise levels and use same to destroy daily quality of life and recklessly endanger the health and welfare of the majority. It’s obvious that “civics” is no longer emphasized in American education and it’s obvious that Jesus and loving one’s neighbor is absent in the heart of those who ride and drive illegally LOUD.
CFR 40 Part 205 and State muffler laws that mirror same via the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution mandate that your vehicle operated on America’s public roadways emit no greater than 80dB(A) total noise energy emissions; this, for the protection of the “We the people” and you have no right, legal or moral, to abuse “We the people” with your unrestrained, selfish, narcissism! “We the people” have had enough of your bully and irresponsible behavior!
Transcribed copy of traffic interview with Steven Dean: xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/19828707/1857849283/name/Steven
I recently located this article by Steven Dean, a Houston Investigative News Reporter that had received a citation from me for operating an illegally loud, illegally equipped Harley Davidson motorcycle within my beat assignment some years ago. Mr. Dean’s accusations and allegations are simply false and misleading, but as a Houston Police Officer, I had essentially surrendered my First Amendment right to free speech and freedom of expression; therefore, until now, I was not afforded the opportunity to adequately respond seeing that I had a family to support and worked for a governmental entity that respects Political Correctness more than the truth and doing the right thing. Though I am still receiving payments from the City of Houston for back-pay/overtime, my policy driven obligation to stifle my free speech and opinions no longer apply. Okay, Steven Dean…let me respond to your accusations and slanderous allegations and let’s see if your “Backpage” slanted media outlet will publish it.
First of all, Steven Dean is simply an arrogant, self-entitled, self-righteous, self-consumed, individual who has deceived himself into believing that he is the harborage of all truth and wisdom. His occupation as an “Investigative Reporter” has somehow, in his own mind, elevated him to a status above the common man; Steven considers himself to be the defender of all “he” considers to be important and relevant…primarily, his own selfish interests. I stopped Steven Dean for operating a motorcycle that emitted decibel levels obviously dangerous to the motoring and pedestrian public. I was simply fulfilling the duties I swore to uphold with diligence some 30 years prior to this traffic stop. Mr. Dean took great offense to having been stopped and cited by a lowly Houston Police Officer and subsequently embarked on a personal mission to damage my reputation and destroy my professional life as a Houston Police Officer. So then, let’s get into Dean’s article and let’s take it one line at a time, okay?
The title of Dean’s article reads: “Houston drivers getting tickets and online harassment campaign from HPD officer.”
Well, Mr. Dean, Houston drivers were getting tickets, large numbers of them from me, especially those who selfishly operated motor vehicles illegally equipped with exhaust mechanisms that not only violated the law, but assaulted the innocent public, a public I had sworn to protect and serve. Do you have a problem with an officer actually doing his job?
“Online Harrassment.” What you interpret as “online harassment” was nothing more than an open forum conversation with motorcyclists holding an opposing view on the subject of loud exhausts and their relevance in the sport of motorcycling…nothing more. Were heart-felt words exchanged? Yes sir! Was I truthful and to the point, yes sir! Was there an HPD policy in effect at the time that restricted the use of and participation in on-line forums, no sir!
Who are the citizens that have accused me of “attacking” them online? Where did you get this information and how did I “attack” them via the Internet? Again, I was involved in a open forum, discussing subjects related to motorcycles and the responsibilities of the motorcycle community to ride respectfully.
You said: “In both cases, his targets were motorcycle riders, which seems to be a one-man mission for this officer.”
Please provide me with the names and information relevant to these two motorcycle riders. As far as a “one-man mission” is concerned; perhaps…I was very much ALONE in my enforcement efforts to bring peace and civility to the roadways and communities within my beat assignment; those areas regularly assaulted by loud biker thugs who care absolutely nothing for the peace and safety of the citizenry.
You said: “While some 30-year veteran HPD officers say they’ve never written a single ticket for loud motorcycles in their entire careers, Holtsclaw’s daily work records show he writes 5 to 8 loud motorcycle tickets per day.”
I will agree that many 30+ year veterans and those with as little as 3 years have done their very best to do as “little” as possible, especially where traffic enforcement is concerned. Why would they? Having to deal with self-righteous individuals such as yourself on a daily basis; deal with a zealous Internal Affairs Division; a weak, impotent, perverse, City Administration; a completely useless and embarrassing Municipal Court system…why would they? These officers say that they’ve never written a ticket for loud motorcycles, yes? Does that somehow nullify the validity of my noise enforcement initiative? Does the fact that I took the initiative to do what is right, to protect the citizenry in my assigned area from the bad behavior of self-righteous loud bikers, like yourself for example, does that make my enforcement initiative a bad thing/irrelevant/wrong? So I wrote an average of 5 to 8 motorcycle tickets per day…how many other citations did I write, Mr. Dean? How many higher misdemeanor and felony arrest did I make, Mr. Dean? How many times was I on the “top performers” list for misdemeanor arrests, felony arrests, citations issued, calls-for-service run, reports written? Your article is not only slanderous, but slanted, prejudiced by your compulsion for revenge and simply wrong!
You said, “In January, Holtsclaw received a written reprimand in his personnel file for lodging an attack on the World Wide Web aimed at one of the dozens of motorcycle riders he has ticketed in recent months.” Okay, Mr. Dean, who did I attack on the “World Wide Web?” Who is it????
You quoted me as writing: “Hey, you are the textbook example of the disrespectful biker I’ve been writing about. You see, the problem is that mom and dad did not spank you little bottom during those formative years and you have obviously never had any real form of discipline in your life…you are vulgar, arrogant, self-absorbed and a spot on society as a whole,” Officer Holdsclaw wrote on a biker’s message board called “Motohouston.com.”
Yes, Mr. Dean…I most likely wrote these very words. Where did you get the idea that this individual was someone I had actually come into contact with? Who was that exchange directed toward? Do you know, Mr. Dean…or are you simply making another assumption? I did exercise my freedom of speech while working for a police department that does not permit such things. In this, I was wrong…but the message is simply the truth and I stand by it today. It is also true that at this time, the Houston Police Department did NOT have a policy that specifically forbid the personal exchange of ideas on an online forum. The Houston P.D. did, soon after my online truths were revealed, develop such a policy. Once the policy was put into effect, my online exchange of ideas ceased.
You said, “He also signed many of the messages at the end with: “Rick HPD.””
This is true, and why wouldn’t I, it’s the truth and I am not ashamed of the truth. How about you, Mr. Dean? The additional quotes from the Internet used in your article are truthful, accurate, to the point. Again, at that time, there was not a policy in effect that prohibited an online exchange of ideas, work related or personal.
You said, “Officer Holtsclaw is known to ride his own motorcycle, and he previously was assigned to work in HPD’s motorcycle detail known as the “Solo Unit.”
Yes, Mr. Dean, I have owned, operated, maintained some 31 motorcycles since age 12. I have ridden professionally, long distance touring, commuting…I have accumulated hundreds-of-thousands of miles on motorcycles; therefore, I know motorcycles and I know motorcyclists. I know you, Mr. Dean and exactly what your selfish motives are and recognize your lack of respect for the citizenry assaulted by your illegal noise and the police that provide you protection!
To continue your personal attacks against me you said: “His Internal Affairs Division complaint history also shows he was sanctioned for misconduct while assigned to the HPD Helicopter Patrol unit. Officers who still work there say it’s a rare thing to be forced to leave the helicopter detail, since the department makes such a huge investment for the special training required to work in that unit. However, in 1993, his misconduct in which he went against a supervisor’s orders prompted him to be transferred, current HPD Helicopter officers say.”
Here you either blatantly lied or your sorely lacking investigative skills, especially relevant to someone who works as an “Investigative Reporter.” I was not forced to leave the Helicopter Division in 1993. I requested a transfer in 2009 as a result of misconduct on the part of the Lieutenant recently assigned there. This Lieutenant had attempted to cover-up a serious infraction of safety protocol and gave me an illegal order to remove documentation from my flight report substantiating this violation. As a result of the illegal order, I politely removed the flight wings from my flight suit, placed the wings on the lieutenant’s desk and requested a transfer to Westside Patrol. I went through Hades in the months to follow as the new Captain of the Helicopter Division took my request for transfer and the method used as a personal insult; this “Captain” proceeded to make my life a living Hades until such time I forced his hand and was transferred to the Special Operations Division prior to my Westside assignment.
The incident you quote in 1993, some 16 years prior to my transfer from the Helicopter Division, was in response to my intercession on behalf of my partner who was being unfairly treated by an over zealous Internal Affairs Sergeant. Long story short, the Internal Affairs Sergeant was preparing to file insubordination on my partner for no valid reason at all. In response, I met with the IAD Sergeant in an adjoining room and took 12 minutes, on two recorders, to tell the arrogant Sergeant exactly what I thought about him and his investigative techniques. The Sergeant then filed on us both…I received a written reprimand for “Respect for fellow employee.” Done. This had absolutely NOTHING to do with my request for a transfer some 16 years later. Again, you lied and obfuscated, Mr. Dean!
You said: “In 1986, he was sanctioned for misconduct while assigned to the Traffic & Accident Division.”
Yes, Mr. Dean. Noting that while I was assigned to the Solo Motorcycle Detail, I was a consistent top performer in arrests/citations issued, I was orally reprimanded for calling a female “darling” on a traffic stop. You see, Mr. Dean, I stopped a violator for not wearing his seat belt. The gentleman was upset for being detained and exited his vehicle to discuss the situation with me. The passenger in the car, the violator’s wife, opened the passenger’s door and asked her husband, “What does he want?” I glanced over at the elderly woman and stated, “Darling, you could also receive a citation for not wearing your seatbelt.” For this, I was advised to refrain from referring to females as “darling.” Being an old southern boy, the term just naturally flows from my mouth… Is this a problem for you, Mr. Dean? Of the hundreds, if not thousands, of contacts I made during my time in traffic enforcement, a few complaints can be expected…not everyone is going to be happy having been stopped by the police. Do you agree, Mr. Dean?
You said, “Within one month of getting the written reprimand for the online smear campaign above, Officer Holtsclaw was given another written reprimand for yet another online attack aimed at this investigative reporter, the author of this article.”
This may have some truth to it, but remember, Mr. Dean…My online contributions on the motorcycle forums were within a relatively short period of time. As a result of an organized effort on the part of motorcycle associations, advising their members to file complaints on me for anything possible to deter my lawful enforcement efforts, my online contributions ran successive, but their introduction to the Internal Affairs did not. Each allegation had to be investigated separately; therefore, “within one month” is irrelevant…and the organized effort of the loud bikers to destroy my credibility was relentless.
Something even more interesting is the fact that I provided my supervisors and the Internal Affairs Division with dash cam audio, personal hidden recorder and video proving that the loud motorcycle thugs had lied in their sworn IAD statements, yet, no charges were filed against them for perjury. Even when HPD’s “Major Offenders Unit” took the documentation for perjury, on the part of the loud bikers, to the Harris County District Attorney’s Office to file charges, nothing was done. The lies, obfuscation, perjury continued. Much like your article.
You said, speaking of yourself, “Officer Holtsclaw, however, was apparently so indignant that a reporter would plead not guilty that he started an online battle in an effort to have the reporter punished or fired from his job at a local television station.”
Mr. Dean, I was not indignant that you had plead “not guilty” relevant to the citation I had written you. Truthfully, I could of cared less. I knew you were guilty, you know you’re guilty…what’s the point? So then, what was my motivation regarding this supposed “online battle” you speak of.
Mr. Dean, After citing you for your violation of common decency; knowing that you had been to Internal Affairs with retaliation as your primary motive; knowing that you’re an “Investigative Reporter” for Channel 2 News; I began noticing news cameras at my regular traffic court sessions. The camera personnel were filming my testimony from the foyer of the court building and subsequently interviewing loud bikers who had just completed adjudicating their citations, “guilty” I might add!
The old cop in me could not help but determine that you had begun a self-initiated investigation relevant to my vehicular noise initiative. Especially after learning that you had filed for an “Open Records” relevant to my personal files and employment history. Internal Affairs advised me that you were relentless in your phone calls to their office, demanding to know how your complaint against me was proceeding, desperately seeking retribution for having been stopped by a lowly Houston Cop and cited…how demeaning to a self-endowed Houston elite, such as yourself.
I figured the camera footage was your doing and in response, I contacted the Noisefree group online and asked them to write you and express their informed opinion regarding the operation of illegally loud motor vehicles on our roadways. My request, in noway, impugned your character or endangered your job status. I simply wanted you to know that there was a portion of the community that understood the illegality, intrusiveness, dangerousness, relevant to the operation of illegally loud motor vehicles on our roadways and within our communities. But you didn’t stop there, did you Mr. Dean?
Apparently, your desperate desire for retribution, led you to coalesce with Fox News and their Investigative Reporter. You knew that any affirmative action on your part to demean me and my enforcement efforts would be readily construed as retribution; therefore, you had your buddy from Fox News carry the ball for you. Not long after, two very slanted, slanderous, career destroying videos were published by Fox News accusing me of harassing the “innocent” bikers in West Houston. Shame on you, Mr. Dean! I might add, I was not allowed to respond to these videos and their spurious allegations, nor was I permitted to defend myself or my professional reputation. If I wanted to maintain employment, if I wanted to continue to support my wife and children, I had to keep my mouth shut and suck it up. It was painful, but I did it…again, shame on you Mr. Dean!
You said and quoted: “In his written reprimand over this online smear campaign, Houston Police Chief Charles McClelland wrote, “You admitted that you contacted the Noiseoff.org website, identified yourself as “Rick HPD/Westside Division” and asked the participants of Noiseoff.org to contact Channel 2 News in Houston and express their opinion regarding noisy vehicles, which resulted in Channel 2 News receiving numerous e-mails on the subject. You admitted you also provided a hyperlink to Channel 2 in the same e-mail in order to expedite the dissemination of information.”
Yes I did, just as I explained in the paragraphs above. HPD did not know what to do with this; had I really done anything wrong? If so, what action should be taken? I was advised by IAD investigators that my on-line discussions had spawned the creation of a new policy that would soon restrict HPD officers on-line conduct. The interoffice discussions began and finally a policy was written to curtail the online dissemination of information. So be it. I had adapted to forfeiting my First Amendment Free Speech rights many years ago; therefore, losing my ability to communicate on-line was just another rung in the PC ladder.
You said and quoted, “Chief McClelland wrote that his actions violated the department’s policy regarding “Conduct and Authority” or “Conduct and Behavior.” His letter states that, “You failed to use sound judgment when you posted information on the Internet regarding the issuance of a citation for loud exhaust to an investigative reporter that works for Channel 2 News.”
So I failed to use sound judgment? Mr. Dean, this is a “catch all” when the Department has nothing substantive to allege; therefore, it is what it is…but my online message was true and accurate. My online message, again, in no way impugned you or endangered your work status.
You said, “The reprimand also spells out that Holtsclaw posted another message on April 14, 2010 where he divulged internal departmental legal issues. The reprimand states he “inaccurately” described that a supervisor had stopped him from writing loud motorcycle tickets, but that City Hall had overturned that decision.”
Again, Mr. Dean, you obfuscate and demonstrate very poor investigative skills. Mr. Dean, I was called into the office by Sergeant Mark Miller of Westside Patrol. Sergeant Miller ordered me to stop issuing noise citations and to stop performing follow-up investigations. Sergeant Miller advised me that, in his opinion, the ordinance relevant to “Noisy Vehicles Generally,” 30-3, was too subjective, to vague and therefore not enforceable.
I interpreted Sergeant Miller’s order to be unlawful, the result of poor judgment and self-interests on his part. Why? Sergeant Miller operated an extremely loud, illegally equipped, racing Corvette and drove the vehicle to the Westside Station at 0545 hours in the morning. The Sergeant’s conduct was irresponsible and reflected poorly on the Houston Police Department. Sergeant Miller was part of the problem, just like you, Mr. Dean.
In response to the unlawful order, I performed research and presented Houston’s City Legal Department with legal precedent, Aguilar V. Texas (2008), which nullified Sergeant Miller’s “subjective” argument. Though it took City Legal five months to render a decision, I was summoned to the Westside Captain’s Office and provided with an apology from Chief McClellend. In addition to the apology, I was subsequently advised that Sergeant Miller’s order to stop issuing citations to loud motor vehicles had been overturned. I was free to resume issuing citations for noise infractions…and I did with a vengeance!
This is the point at which your loud biker thugs began their organized campaign to ruin my reputation and injure my 31 year career via lies and selfish behavior. Who do you think took the complaints of your loud biker thug buddies at the Westside Station? Right, Sergeant Miller. How do you think the worm turned for me after forcing a supervisors hand and embarrassing him by having his order overturned by the authorities Downtown? A supervisor with clout and influence in the Department? Your thug buddies organized two different protests at Houston’s City Hall. Your thug buddies threatened Mayor Parker and the City Council members, threatening to fire them if they did not stop my enforcement initiative.
You said, “In other words, the Traffic & Accident Squad at HPD has units that are specifically devoted to traffic enforcement, but Holtsclaw works patrol. That means calls from citizens may be taking the back seat while he carries out his mission to issue tickets to so many motorcycles.”
Mr. Dean, you’re simply wrong, once again. Yes, HPD does have a traffic enforcement squad. These officers patrol the freeways and their primary duty is “speed” enforcement. There is no one entity assigned to bring the out-of-control noise violators, such as yourself, under control; therefore, I took on that responsibility myself. Also, regarding the “citizens may be taking the back seat while he carries out his mission to issue tickets to so many motorcycles.” This also is simply not true. Look at my record for calls-for-service run, my arrests for thefts, domestic violence, my follow-up investigations resulting in warrants and arrests for fraud, assault, theft. Investigation that ended with an arrest for sexual abuse of a child, murder, in-state/out of state warrant arrests for a sundry of serious violations. Did you, as an “Investigative Reporter,” take the time to research these documented statistics? My shift Lieutenant at the time commented to me that he would have sanctioned me for spending too much time on traffic arrests, but my work record, calls-for-service record, showed that my traffic investigations posed no hindrance to my patrol obligations. No, Mr. Dean, you only obfuscated and reported what you could misconstrue as dirt and filth…shame on you Dean!!!
You said, “In this reporter’s case, trial was set to begin at Houston Municipal Court in February but the case was dismissed. The prosecutor was told that all of the above information, including the written reprimands and daily work records would be introduced to the jury, but the judge then advised that the case was dismissed because Officer Holtsclaw did not show up for the trial.”
Well, Mr. Dean, had I been issued the proper subpoena for your trial and if I was not tied-up on more pressing matters in patrol, I would have loved to have testified against you. My court attendance records will substantiate the fact that I go to court, I testify and that 99% of my noise cases adjudicated via trial resulted in a pricey conviction. Your thug loud biker buds were leaving my court with hatred in their eyes and revenge in their heart. You see, Mr. Dean, the problem is, after your loud thug buddies began threatening and demanding that City Hall do something about my “lawful and Constituional” enforcement of the law, my Mayor and Police Chief cowed to the threats, concerned for the city coffer, the Department discretely began to rewrite City Ordinance 30-3 in such a way as to exclude modified exhaust mechanisms. Even though Mayor Parker admitted during an open forum, in response to the loud bikers demand that I be stopped, that I was acting in accordance with policy, your loud thug buddies continued to threaten and demand. The motorcycle community is comprised of individuals with political clout and an abundance of “expendable” income. In the political arena, right, lawfulness, correctness, takes a backseat to the all mighty dollar and political influence.
A Department Circular was subsequently issued stating that City Ordinance 30-3 could no longer be used for noisy vehicle violations and that any officer wanting to issue a citation for a noisy vehicle would have to default to using the State of Texas Motor Vehicle Code, section 547.604, “Muffler Required.” In response, Houston’s weak and impotent Municipal Court System began summarily dismissing my citations in fear of reprisal and void for vagueness Constitutional issues.
Problem was, Mr. Dean, the City of Houston did NOT have a proper “charging instrument” relevant to the State Code, 547.604; therefore, when I issued citations using the State law, the attached “charging instrument” was “defective” and my citations were subsequently dismissed. Houston does not want their officers using the State code because the monies generated from State code violations, for the most part, goes to the State. Houston desires that officers write the City Code; thereby, keeping the money at home…again, it’s all about the MONEY!
Anyway, in response to the fact that there was not a valid State charging instrument, I THREW A FIT! The Houston Police Department, in response, sent my patrol supervisor to the Municipal Court and demanded that an accurate and legal charging instrument be provided for violations of State Traffic Code, 547.604. But guess what, Mr. Dean. Because of you and your loud thug biker buddies, I never got the opportunity to use that “new”charging instrument. Why? The Houston Police Department decided to cow to the pressure of biker complaints and subsequently pulled me from street duty and assigned me to the front desk at Westside. Like one old tenured officer from the Downtown Travis HPD Headquarters called and told me, “Rick, be careful…HPD will not hesitate to throw an officer under the bus at the first hint of controversy.” He is so very correct.
Then, to top it off, I received a phone call from the Westside Captain telling me to report to Internal Affairs because I was temporarily being relieved of duty. The Captain advised that a loud biker in one of my municipal courts had complained that I threatened him. Truth is, I didn’t even know the biker was in court, nor did I ever speak to him. The IAD Lieutenant investigating the allegation brought me into his office and advised me that the complaint was simply foolishness, that the complaint should be exonerated soon and that he could not believe IAD had done this. I certainly could. It was at that point that I decided this old rednecked boy needed to seek a life of peace and tranquility elsewhere. Considering the fact that my police department had failed to support my lawful and Constitutional efforts to enforce the law, to bring civility and peace to the streets and communities in my assigned area; seeing that I could no longer perform actual police work, I made the affirmative decision to retire. I honorably retired from the Houston Police Department in August of 2011, 31.5 years of service…bet that made your day Mr. Dean, yes?
In summation, Mr. Dean. I did my job, just like I’ve done from the moment I first set foot on the premises of 61 Riesner in November of 1979. I truly loved being a cop, cut me and I’ll bleed blue. All that I have done, all that I gave the citizens of Houston, though not appreciated, I would do it again, because I have given my best. Though, through the course of my career, I was forced to deal with unscrupulous, self-righteous individuals, such as yourself, I WOULD DO IT AGAIN! Semper Fi.
(Houston) — If getting a ticket wasn’t frustrating enough, some Houston drivers are being targeted for intense online harassment campaigns by the HPD officer w